Re: Implementation of ETRN

2000-11-16 Thread Markus Stumpf
On Thu, Nov 16, 2000 at 08:55:03AM -0600, Charles Cazabon wrote: > Essentially you want AutoTURN. It's better than ETRN and requires no > special support by the client. We use a similar approach. However, we do queue the eMails in Maildirs mapped to domain names, i.e. /var/qmail/etrn/example.c

Re: Implementation of ETRN

2000-11-16 Thread Charles Cazabon
Philip Tong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Has anybody tried implementations of ETRN on QMail? > > If yes, what would be a good choice and where can I get more information on > it? djb's qmail FAQ contains a brief entry: http://cr.yp.to/qmail/faq/servers.html Essentially you want AutoTURN. It's