Not able to connect through outlook express

hi all,   I have qmail running on linux, i am able to receive and send emails through SQWEB mail, but i am not able to get my emails through outlook express. I get error " there was problem logging onto your mail server. Your passowrd was rejected. Protocol:POP3, Server Response:-ER

RE: Not able to connect through outlook express

mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2001 5:03 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Not able to connect through outlook express hi all, I have qmail running on linux, i am able to receive and send emails through SQWEB mail, but i am not able to get my emails through outlook express. I get

Re: Not able to connect through outlook express

On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 05:02:46PM -0700, Harry wrote: > hi all, > > I have qmail running on linux, i am able to receive and send emails through SQWEB >mail, but i am not able to get my emails through outlook express. I get error " there >was problem logging onto yo

not able to connect through outlook express

hi i am new to this list. I have qmail runnuing. I am able to send and recieve email via the sqwebmail but my password is rejected when i try to connect through outlook. I do not have postfix running, does this matter? Any help. harvinder - Original Message - From: "george" <[EMAIL PRO

Outlook Express and qmail

We have been having trouble getting qmail to communicate with certain Outlook Express customers. This is probably a problem with Outlook, but I thought maybe some of you might have had experience with this. The problem occurs when customers try to send mail out through are qmail server. If

Re: outlook and outlook express

you need to set up their PCs with the correct local time. On Tue, 10 Apr 2001, you wrote: > Hello everyone, > We have recently changed to Qmail and since doing so anyone with outlook and > outlook express is logging time at grenwich time How do we change the > time, oh by th

Re: outlook and outlook express

http://www.faqts.com/knowledge_base/view.phtml/aid/1167 http://www.faqts.com/knowledge_base/view.phtml/aid/1222 > From: "Robin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2001 16:25:56 -1000 > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: outlook and outlook express >

outlook and outlook express

Hello everyone, We have recently changed to Qmail and since doing so anyone with outlook and outlook express is logging time at grenwich time How do we change the time, oh by the way in the mail itself the time is correct just not in the log in the inbox. Robin

Re: Outlook Express Prank

> Right. You're still using Outlook on a technical mailing list. So? You're still a moron - yet that doesn't stop you. Besides, he's using Outlook Express, not Outlook > message still looks bad, has no reference headers (cf. "broken list > archive")

Re: Outlook Express Prank

Quoting Einar Bordewich ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > "Robin S. Socha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > * Hubbard, David <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > What does the MUA have to do with an MTA? > > > > Show me a competent Unix admin using Outlook or a similar > > abomination and I won't show you the difference

Re: Outlook Express Prank

336 1420 E-Mail: eibo(at)newmedia.no - Original Message - From: "Chris Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, December 11, 2000 11:11 PM Subject: Re: Outlook Express Prank > On Mon,

Re: Outlook Express Prank

- Original Message - From: "Robin S. Socha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Qmail-List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, December 11, 2000 10:19 PM Subject: Re: Outlook Express Prank > * Hubbard, David <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > What doe

Re: Outlook Express Prank

t;>>>>>>>>>> Original Message <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< On 12/12/00, 11:22:18 AM, Aaron "L." Meehan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote regarding Re: Outlook Express Prank: > Quoting James Stevens ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): &

Re: Outlook Express Prank

Quoting James Stevens ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > Without going into a 20 page technical look at every bug here's some > simple tips even biggeners should know. > > 1. Don't use the 'Preview' plane. > 2. Don't let or set Outlook to open messages automatically. > 3. Don't open any executable or any ot

Re: Outlook Express Prank

Just when you thought he couldn't possibly more clearly define the word moronic through his typed dialogue... jason This email brought to you by Outlook Express - accept it > Show me a competent Unix admin using Outlook or a similar abomination > and I won't show yo

Re: Outlook Express Prank

nd very little > to destroy. > > Pranksters usually enjoy the power of destruction they gain with a > little knowledge. While I'm not a prankster, I find it unnecessary to refrain from posting any text that may cause Outlook Express to crash. I am operating within standards,

Re: Outlook Express Prank

Well let's see.. Been Managing Unix systems for about 5 years now .. Did start on Mac's then Windows then Unix so yeah I kinda went the long way but I have been using Outlook Express almost since the beging.. It has just been recently that I have started using other MUA's ... H

Re: Outlook Express Prank

martin langhoff wrote: > We are on the *internet*. Welcome. Precisely. If you must use software that cannot handle the full spectrum of demands the Internet presents, don't blame the Internet. - Amitai

Re: Outlook Express Prank

nd very little > to destroy. > Everyone needs to take a deep breath and just relax. The message I posted was in the context of a discussion of certain types of legal addresses that mutt didn't handle correctly. As an aside, I posted a message with an address in it that caused Outlook

RE: Outlook Express Prank

Exactly my point... I wouldn't say for myself, that I am a competent sysadmin... After all I take care of only five servers running qmail on Linux... The company I work for uses Exchange, so I am forced to use Outlook (2k). I would use anything else, but the smtp port is closed to the outside... s

Re: Outlook Express Prank

On Mon, Dec 11, 2000 at 10:19:27PM +0100, "Robin S. Socha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Recommended reading for obvious newbies like yourself: > I took a look at the attribute page because I had had a recent discussion with someone over whether or not date and/or

Re: Outlook Express Prank

mail-List Subject: Re: Outlook Express Prank Show me a competent Unix admin using Outlook or a similar abomination and I won't show you the difference. Recommended reading for obvious newbies like yourself: <http://learn.to/attribute/> <http://learn.to/sign/> <http://learn.t

Re: Outlook Express Prank

On Mon, Dec 11, 2000 at 02:03:20PM -0500, Alex Pennace wrote: # On Mon, Dec 11, 2000 at 02:46:02PM -0300, martin langhoff wrote: # > Please do be kind with your fellow admins even if they do things you # > wouldn't do. Dropping a bomb such as that, *knowingly* is very # > unfriendly. No one de

Re: Outlook Express Prank

;ll save time. A few hours ago some jokester ( Chris Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ) sent a msg that read > If you want to have fun with Outlook Express users, put this in your signature: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [replace QUOTE with " ... I didn't know if were

Re: Outlook Express Prank

Felix von Leitner wrote: > Doesn't it seem a little idiotic to use Outlook on a > mailing list about an Unix MTA? We are on the *internet*. Welcome. Many people, many machines, lots of strange company policies, personal choices and other constraints. Please refrain from making

Re: Outlook Express Prank

* Hubbard, David <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > What does the MUA have to do with an MTA? Show me a competent Unix admin using Outlook or a similar abomination and I won't show you the difference. Recommended reading for obvious newbies like yourself:

Re: Outlook Express Prank

Alex, this is not a call for censorchip, please! We are on a public list! I'm asking for a bit of professionalism. Whoever posted that practical joke was doing it on purpose -- and that's not professional at all. Professionals know that it takes a lot of work to build, and very

RE: Outlook Express Prank

What does the MUA have to do with an MTA? -Original Message- From: Felix von Leitner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 11, 2000 3:35 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Outlook Express Prank Doesn't it seem a little idiotic to use Outlook on a mailing list abo

Re: Outlook Express Prank

Thus spake martin langhoff ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > this is not reasonable. > Please do be kind with your fellow admins even if they do things you > wouldn't do. Dropping a bomb such as that, *knowingly* is very > unfriendly. No one deserves being crashed by a prankster, and nobody is >

Re: Outlook Express Prank

In the immortal words of Alex Pennace ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > No one deserves to be censored because some people made a poor choice > for their MUA. At what point, exactly, did asking someone to act like (a) a professional and (b) a decent human being become censorship? Oh, right, the same point

Re: Outlook Express Prank

Hi, Could somebody resend me the original post concerning this? It seems I deleted it on accident and it may have been removed from the list archives... Thanks, Mike

Re: Outlook Express Prank

On Mon, Dec 11, 2000 at 02:46:02PM -0300, martin langhoff wrote: > Please do be kind with your fellow admins even if they do things you > wouldn't do. Dropping a bomb such as that, *knowingly* is very > unfriendly. No one deserves being crashed by a prankster, and nobody is > expecting such

Outlook Express Prank

boys and girls, this is not reasonable. Please do be kind with your fellow admins even if they do things you wouldn't do. Dropping a bomb such as that, *knowingly* is very unfriendly. No one deserves being crashed by a prankster, and nobody is expecting such uncivil behaviour in

Re: Outlook Express bug

gt; > Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Monday, December 11, 2000 12:13 PM > Subject: Re: [OT] Outlook Express bug > > > > On Mon, Dec 11, 2000 at 12:04:11PM -0600, dG wrote: > > > Great! The last thing I expected to have to do when I came into work > t

Re: [OT] Outlook Express bug

; post. Now that my client is pretty much fucked any suggestions on how I can > get these damn emails off my machine since everytime I try to delete them > they lock up. Don't open them. If you don't open them, they won't hurt you. If you've opened one and Outlook Express lo

Re: Outlook Express bug

On Mon, Dec 11, 2000 at 12:29:39PM -0600, dG wrote: > Just because you can do something doesn't mean you should. For me it was a > huge annoyance which pissed me off but there are hundreds and thousands of > people out there who are not technical in any way for whom this would be a > major crisis

Re: Outlook Express bug

> To: "dG" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, December 11, 2000 11:19 AM Subject: Re: Outlook Express bug

Re: Outlook Express bug

On Mon, Dec 11, 2000 at 12:03:49PM -0600, dG wrote: > Great! The last thing I expected to have to do when I came into work today > was to deal with some asshole who thought it would be funny to fuck with > everyone using IE. Even funnier are the idiots who reply back to the same > post. Now tha

Outlook Express bug

Great! The last thing I expected to have to do when I came into work today was to deal with some asshole who thought it would be funny to fuck with everyone using IE. Even funnier are the idiots who reply back to the same post. Now that my client is pretty much fucked any suggestions on how I c

Re: Outlook Express

ople are getting the mail FINE off the same PRI/RAS/LAN/SERVER. Paul Farber Farber Technology [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ph 570-628-5303 Fax 570-628-5545 On Wed, 8 Nov 2000, Dennis Duval wrote: > > Hi everyone. I use the pop daemon from qmail (qmail-pop3d) and the > > Outlook Express program is

Re: Outlook Express

> Hi everyone. I use the pop daemon from qmail (qmail-pop3d) and the > Outlook Express program is making me crazy. I looked for a solution in the > archives, but i didn't find it. My problem is: > > My clients use Microshit Outlook Express and i'm having a lot of error

Re: Outlook Express

> Hi everyone. I use the pop daemon from qmail (qmail-pop3d) and the > Outlook Express program is making me crazy. Outlook makes everyone crazy. Get yourself a real email program. One that gives meaningful error messages. > What is happening? Read your log files. Felix

RE: Outlook Express

hi, admin wrote: > Hi everyone. I use the pop daemon from qmail (qmail-pop3d) and the how are you starting the pop3-daemon? try a telnet mail.infomoney.com.br on port 110 from one of your client workstation. is there a sudden response or a timeout? and : what does the log say?(TM) ;) a

Outlook Express

Hi everyone. I use the pop daemon from qmail (qmail-pop3d) and the Outlook Express program is making me crazy. I looked for a solution in the archives, but i didn't find it. My problem is: My clients use Microshit Outlook Express and i'm having a lot of error messages from qmail

Attachments are not going through Outlook Express

Iam Putting My problems again, Can anybody Help > Can anybody help!!! > > I have qmail running on Linux 6.1 server , since last 5 months, As the linux > users have increased qmail is rejecting to accept the mails sent through > outlook express with an attachments.? > What co

Attachments are not going through Outlook Express

Can anybody help!!! I have qmail running on Linux 6.1 server , since last 5 months, As the linux users have increased qmail is rejecting to accept the mails sent through outlook express with an attachments.? What could be the problem??? As since all these months it was working fine. The error

Re: email error from outlook express

: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2000 8:29 PM Subject: Re: email error from outlook express > delete the file rcpthosts in /var/qmail/control > > At 11:30 PM 7/5/2000 +0530, you wrote: > >Sir here is the message displayed by outlookexpress when sending mails &

Re: smtp-auth and MS Outlook Express 5

>I'm not completely sure how the authenticated SMTP conversation >looks like. You have two possible approaches: > >1. qmail-popup like. You start SMTP conversation as a root, grab a >username/password, verify it, drop root and go on. (That's what >qmail-popup -> checkpassword -> qmail-pop3d seque

Re: smtp-auth and MS Outlook Express 5

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 29 May 00, at 15:49, Krzysztof Dabrowski wrote: > so we finally need a good , versatile solution for it. Because a lot > of users have problems with it and not everyone wants to go ahead and > patch his way through qmail-smtpd. I'm not completely

Re: smtp-auth and MS Outlook Express 5

>It's as simple as that. so we finally need a good , versatile solution for it. Because a lot of users have problems with it and not everyone wants to go ahead and patch his way through qmail-smtpd. Brush

Re: smtp-auth and MS Outlook Express 5

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 29 May 00, at 15:31, Krzysztof Dabrowski wrote: > Don't you think that this histeric reaction is a bit too far? > checkpassword is certainly safer suid program that most of suids in > your system. No it is not. Any program which allows to enumera

Re: smtp-auth and MS Outlook Express 5

>Do not, EVER, do that. The moment you do, checkpassword becomes a /bin/su >replacement without any logging or limiting. Don't you think that this histeric reaction is a bit too far? checkpassword is certainly safer suid program that most of suids in your system. And another one: >Don't do t

RE: smtp-auth and MS Outlook Express 5

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 29 May 00, at 8:52, Denise Williams wrote: > solution: /bin/checkpassword needs to be suid'ed to root for those > systems using shadow passwords. Don't do that! You have just created a target for a dictionary attack; suid /bin/checkpassword is /

Re: smtp-auth and MS Outlook Express 5

On Mon, May 29, 2000 at 08:52:05AM -0400, Denise Williams wrote: > Hi, I received mail from Krzysztof Dabrowski that solved my problem. > > solution: /bin/checkpassword needs to be suid'ed to root for those systems > using shadow passwords. Do not, EVER, do that. The moment you do, checkpassword

RE: smtp-auth and MS Outlook Express 5

] Sent: May 29, 2000 9:32:33 AM GMT Subject: smtp-auth and MS Outlook Express 5 Hello, I am having problems using smtp-auth from an MS Outlook Express 5 client. Namely I can do pop but I can't smtp-auth. I can also smtp. __ FREE Personalized Email

smtp-auth and MS Outlook Express 5

Hello, I am having problems using smtp-auth from an MS Outlook Express 5 client. Namely I can do pop but I can't smtp-auth. I can also smtp. My setup: Server: Running Linux 2.2.12-20, Redhat 6.1 Qmail-1.03 tcpserver out of ucspi-tcp-0.88 supervise out of daemontools-0.70 SMTP-AUTH patch:

Outlook Express and SMTPD problems??

First, I have a perfectly functioning Qmail 1.03 to the tune of about 20K messeges/day. So this is really a MUA question, but geez, remember we're talking about Microsoft here folks, get a straight answer?, unlikely. So this is a more "have you ever encountered?" Outlook Express

qmail pop3 & outlook express (encoding problem)

l tests, I found some problems.   If the mail is written in plain text-case of using pine, there is no problem.   If I use outlook express, I can choose content type(html, text)   and encoding methods(base 64, quoted printable, 7bits).   So when I choose 7bits, there is no problem.

Re: Problems while downloading E-Mails with Outlook-Express

for dial-in and ethernet (576 and 1500) > I know that this is not an outlook-probs list. But maybe you can help me > in some way. There are no solutions. You can forcefeed all incoming mail through a filter which removes double dots. That will destroy some attachments. You can tell peo

Re: Problems while downloading E-Mails with Outlook-Express

Cyril, Have you ruled out problems with header compression and other PPP related features of the dial-up connection? I have seen problems in other applications clear up when features like header compression were turned off. Bob Robert Sanderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cyril Bitterich wrote:

Re: Problems while downloading E-Mails with Outlook-Express

Hi, first of all. I'm subscribed to this list. So please no CCs to me. > The problem here isn't SSL, so let's not discuss that further. Yes it's not SSL. > When I looked at the message using mutt, it turns out that > there was a series of dots, all on lines on their own, followed by a > line of

Re: Problems while downloading E-Mails with Outlook-Express

On Fri, Sep 10, 1999 at 09:43:29AM +0300, Anand Buddhdev wrote: > . > . > . > . > . > some text > This is a known and confirmed bug in various versions of outlook. To make things worse, the bug only bites if the last packet contains just dots. To make a sure way to cause trouble for LookOut ehr

Re: Problems while downloading E-Mails with Outlook-Express

ort: > 'Vielleicht sollte ich's mal mit "Learning by doing" versuchen???', > Anschluss: 110, Secure (SSL): Nein, Serverfehler: 0x800CCC90, > Fehlernummer: > 0x800420CD. > ME TOO!!! (okay, just kidding). We have been having this problem for months

Re: Problems while downloading E-Mails with Outlook-Express

On Thu, Sep 09, 1999 at 09:38:07PM +0200, Cyril Bitterich wrote: The problem here isn't SSL, so let's not discuss that further. It's a coincidence that this should be reported, because I had the same problem a few days ago. Outlook crashed when retrieving a certain message from a POP account. Whe

Re: Problems while downloading E-Mails with Outlook-Express

27;s customers into a MicroShit-only solution. Best of luck. Charles Cazabon wrote: > > Cyril Bitterich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Whenever I'm trying to receive the E-Mails via telnet or Netscape there > > is no Problem but using Outlook-Express the downl

RE: Problems while downloading E-Mails with Outlook-Express

9, 1999 2:28 PM > To: Cyril Bitterich > Cc: Qmail > Subject: Re: Problems while downloading E-Mails with Outlook-Express > > > On Thu, Sep 09, 1999 at 09:38:07PM +0200, Cyril Bitterich wrote: > > Nachricht Nr. 30 konnte nicht abgerufen werden. Konto: 'gunnet '

Re: Problems while downloading E-Mails with Outlook-Express

loor [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Simi Valley, CA 93065 Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur. - Original Message - From: Adam D . McKenna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Cyril Bitterich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Qmail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thu 9 Sep 1999 14.28 Subject: Re: Proble

Re: Problems while downloading E-Mails with Outlook-Express

uot; versuchen???', > Anschluss: 110, Secure (SSL): Nein, Serverfehler: 0x800CCC90, > Fehlernummer: > 0x800420CD. I like how Outlook Express reports a Secure (SSL) connection, even though it is obvious that this is just a regular clear-text POP3 connection. --Adam

Re: Problems while downloading E-Mails with Outlook-Express

Cyril Bitterich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Whenever I'm trying to receive the E-Mails via telnet or Netscape there > is no Problem but using Outlook-Express the download always hangs with > message nr. 30. > > Any hints? I think you've solved the pr

Problems while downloading E-Mails with Outlook-Express

#x27;, Anschluss: 110, Secure (SSL): Nein, Serverfehler: 0x800CCC90, Fehlernummer: 0x800420CD. The first line says that the messeage nr. 30 could not be retrieved, then comes the outlook-express alias for that spezial connection and then after the word "Serverantwort:" some line that should b

Re: Outlook Express and remove message after X time

On Fri, 13 Aug 1999, Eric Dahnke wrote: > Shouldn't be like that unless their copy of Outlook is broken. What's > the acronym ULID? It's UIDL. However, dollar to doughnuts that the guy is talking about some proprietary MSexchange extension.

Re: Outlook Express and remove message after X time

Shouldn't be like that unless their copy of Outlook is broken. What's the acronym ULID? Ken Jones escribió: > > Does anyone know if the qmail pop3 server (or any patches) support > the Outlook Express features to: > > 1) Leave a copy on the server > 2) Delet

Outlook Express and remove message after X time

Does anyone know if the qmail pop3 server (or any patches) support the Outlook Express features to: 1) Leave a copy on the server 2) Delete copy after X days Not surprisingly, people who set this option end up downloading the same email every time they check pop, untill X days are over

Problems retrieving mail with Outlook Express...

Hi all: We have installed qmail 1.03 with qmail-pop3d in our mail server. From time to time, there are users with Microsoft mail clientes (Outlook, Outlook Express, Internet Mail, occasionally Exchange) who can't retrieve messages with attachments. The mail program just hangs, or

Re: Outlook Express and IMAP

It's close. The basic IMAP stuff is there, but their seems to be a problem with extra folder support. Of course this could be the IMAP server fault too. Also I'm not crazy about the UI but I'll have to play with it for awhile. Thanks for the tip --Dave > >I haven't tried it yet, but the latest P

Re: Outlook Express and IMAP

On Thu, Jun 03, 1999 at 10:03:08AM -0400, Dave Teske wrote: > As for the suggestion of a non MS client, I've looked at eudora and a few > others and they are actually worse. Eudora blows for Imap. It always wants > to show every file in the users dir even the . files. I was able to work > around

Re: Outlook Express and IMAP

> I'm getting just a teensy bit fed up with Microsoft and their approach to > Internet Standards... > > Outlook Express version 5 has fixed most of my issues with IMAP bar this > one: Outlook creates a 'special' folder called Inbox. >From "INTERNET-DRAFT

Re: Outlook Express and IMAP

Could it be the IMAP server? I have several people (including myself) running Outlook Express 4.72 which also wants an "Inbox" and I'm not getting any errors. Our setup is qmail 1.03 with the patched for maildir UW Imap server running both Maildirs and Mailboxs. As for the suggest

RE: Outlook Express and IMAP

On Thursday, June 03, 1999 5:24 AM, Jim Gilliver [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: > I'm getting just a teensy bit fed up with Microsoft and their approach to > Internet Standards... > [...] > Does anyone have any ideas or suggestions for me? > Yes use something other than Microsoft

Outlook Express and IMAP

I'm getting just a teensy bit fed up with Microsoft and their approach to Internet Standards... Outlook Express version 5 has fixed most of my issues with IMAP bar this one: Outlook creates a 'special' folder called Inbox. This folder doesn't exist on the IMAP server, so

Qmail, IMAP, and the god-forsaken Outlook Express

Hi there, We're running qmail on linux with Outlook Express clients on Win95/8 (shudder). The server works perfectly running POP3 and SMTP, and it now does user-controlled auto-forwarding (via an email-parsing .qmail generator =) ). Unfortunately, now we need a small group of compute