Il 22/11/2024 09:31, Stefanos Natsis via QGIS-PSC ha scritto:
I therefore suggest that the PSC amends the Charter [0], explicitly
making all four types of voting members as mutually exclusive positions,
similar to how voting member and PSC positions are already mutually
exclusive.
Hi Stefanos
Hi Marco, lists
While I trust German and the Colombian user group's democratic procedures
for delivering a vote to their representative, I deeply believe that having
the same person as both a country voting member and a community voting
member is a step in the wrong direction.
It defeats the purpo
let's continue the discussion on the psc list.
Cheers Marco
-- Forwarded message -
From: Marco Bernasocchi
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2024, 23:07
Subject: Re: [Qgis-voting-members] [Qgis-user] Call For Community Voting
members ballot
To: Stefanos Natsis
Cc: Raymond Nijssen , QGIS Communi
Hi Andrea thanks for that, indeed this is wrong on the page and re reading
the statutes they should have been removed completely.
Since Alessandro and Régis became psc members, they, as it was alwaysthe
case, refrained from taking part in community voting.
I will discuss this in the next psc and
(Re-sending my response because I think we lost some Cc mailing-lists in
the thread)
El vie, 22 nov 2024 a las 9:57, Germán Carrillo ()
escribió:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Thanks for raising this topic.
>
> First of all, thanks to all of you for being elected as community voting
> member. It means a lot
