On 03/06/14 21:50, Paolo Cavallini wrote:
Il 03/06/2014 15:47, custard ha scritto:
I'm not sure that those are proper svg. They look like svg wrapped around
something
binary (a png?). I didn't know that was legal.
it should be
Ah, so much for V for Vector.
Either way they're lacking th
Il 03/06/2014 16:07, Richard Duivenvoorde ha scritto:
> yours are probably bad examples. These svg files have raster images
> encapsulated, which is ok for svg, but I do not think you can ever
> change color of those on the fly...
>
> what you probably mean are true vector svg symbols, on those y
On 03-06-14 15:50, Paolo Cavallini wrote:
> Il 03/06/2014 15:47, custard ha scritto:
>
>> I'm not sure that those are proper svg. They look like svg wrapped around
>> something
>> binary (a png?). I didn't know that was legal.
Hi Paolo,
yours are probably bad examples. These svg files have rast
Il 03/06/2014 15:47, custard ha scritto:
> I'm not sure that those are proper svg. They look like svg wrapped around
> something
> binary (a png?). I didn't know that was legal.
it should be
> Either way they're lacking the "fill", "stroke", and "stroke-width"
> parameters that
> the sourcepol
On 03/06/14 21:04, Paolo Cavallini wrote:
Hi all.
According to
http://www.sourcepole.com/svg-symbols-in-qgis-with-modifiable-colors
to make it possible to change the colour of SVG symbols, a special syntax
should be used.
Of course nobody wants to rewrite his symbols, so the question is: is ther