On Monday, 9 June 2025, 11:08:14 CEST Richard Duivenvoorde via QGIS-Developer
wrote:
> I'd say: QGIS4 is Qt6-only, but we need to have a Qt6 option (be it 3.40 or
> higher) available for (Linux) python devs.
>
> Note that, thanks to Juergen, Windows users/devs already have the option to
> test th
Richard Duivenvoorde via QGIS-Developer
writes:
> My personal(!) view for Linux packaging (as Linux user, not packager).
>
> Stick to 3.40/LTR/Qt5 for QGIS3.
> (Well, that is what our Debian packager does, not sure what your users expect)
>
> One reason to have a Qt6 package available is that you
My personal(!) view for Linux packaging (as Linux user, not packager).
Stick to 3.40/LTR/Qt5 for QGIS3.
(Well, that is what our Debian packager does, not sure what your users expect)
One reason to have a Qt6 package available is that you give Plugin devs the
ability to have Qt6 based QGIS so th
For background:
pkgsrc is behind, on 3.34.x. (Yes, I know 3.40 is out. :-)
pkgsrc follows LTRs. Probably we should move to every release,
because we don't need LTR, and non-LTR releases are not unstable, just
updated for a shorter period.
1) We have py-sip6 6.10.0. 6.11.1 and 6.12.0 h
