Re: [QGIS-Developer] Regular paid positions for PR reviews

2023-12-08 Thread Germán Carrillo via QGIS-Developer
Hi All, Thanks Alessandro for raising this. First of all, thanks a lot to all PR reviewers for their outstanding work. As an occasional QGIS contributor (for a long time), I've definitely noticed a lack of PR reviewers lately. It'd be great if the QGIS association could pay more core devs to par

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Regular paid positions for PR reviews

2023-12-08 Thread Alessandro Pasotti via QGIS-Developer
On Fri, Dec 8, 2023 at 9:22 AM Andreas Neumann wrote: > > Dear Alex, > > I support this idea. Code reviews are important. > > But I think we already do that - don't we? In 2023 there was this 14k € > budget that is currently being distributed between the core devs who are > actively reviewing on

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Regular paid positions for PR reviews

2023-12-08 Thread Andreas Neumann via QGIS-Developer
Dear Alex, I support this idea. Code reviews are important. But I think we already do that - don't we? In 2023 there was this 14k € budget that is currently being distributed between the core devs who are actively reviewing on Github. Next year, we plan to increase this budget to 20k. Are we mis

[QGIS-Developer] Regular paid positions for PR reviews

2023-12-07 Thread Alessandro Pasotti via QGIS-Developer
Hi, Recently I have had the opportunity to discuss with some core QGIS developers and we agreed that it would be a good idea if the QGIS organization could fund a few weekly or monthly hours for PR reviews. Here is my quick and initial proposal of requisites for the candidates: - must be an acti