Re: [QGIS-Developer] Funding and PR review

2022-01-04 Thread Alexis R.L.
Greeting Andreas, Thanks for the reply, what I simply wanted to propose was to advertise in some way how users and sustaining members would benefit from more funding. If we could use standing issues and standing PR as showcases of how funds could benefit the project, that might entice some to con

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Funding and PR review

2022-01-04 Thread Andreas Neumann
Hi Alex, Happy new year to you as well! We increased the funding for PR reviews from 10 to 14k. However, it is up to the reviewers (currently Nyall, Matthias and Alessandro, in the future probably also Martin) to decide what PRs they are looking at. I understand that the above figure doesn't gua

[QGIS-Developer] Funding and PR review

2022-01-02 Thread Alexis R.L.
Greetings Everyone, Some points have been going through my head and I was curious to know if there could be good ideas in them for discussion and opportunities. One aspect that can irk new and existing contributors (or maybe just myself) is when it comes to PR reviews. As some work on either side