[QGIS-Developer] GRASS on Windows issue

2023-12-08 Thread Gandalf the Gray via QGIS-Developer
Hi guys. I know this a QGIS list, but maybe Windows packagers for the OSGeo4W stack lurk around here. I have sent this to GRASS dev list after sending to OSGeo4W list a week ago to no avail. I hope anyone can help me. On a clean install of OSGeo4W (and for that matter standalone QGIS and GRASS

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Regular paid positions for PR reviews

2023-12-08 Thread Germán Carrillo via QGIS-Developer
Hi All, Thanks Alessandro for raising this. First of all, thanks a lot to all PR reviewers for their outstanding work. As an occasional QGIS contributor (for a long time), I've definitely noticed a lack of PR reviewers lately. It'd be great if the QGIS association could pay more core devs to par

Re: [QGIS-Developer] QGIS Full Stack Web Developer Report

2023-12-08 Thread Nicolas Cadieux via QGIS-Developer
Hi,If possible, can we place all 3 models in a “group” or “project?” Each model depends on the other one but currently, they must be upload one at a time.  That could be a good improvement to the server.Good luck!Nicolas CadieuxLe 7 déc. 2023 à 21:57, Lova Andriarimalala a écrit : Dear Nic

Re: [QGIS-Developer] QGIS Documentation Writer

2023-12-08 Thread Selma Vidimlic via QGIS-Developer
Hello all, Merged pull requests from this week: - 3D Tiles Chapter with two commits from this week: 1. fixes after review and update opening_data file

Re: [QGIS-Developer] QGIS Full Stack Web Developer Report

2023-12-08 Thread Lova Andriarimalala via QGIS-Developer
Hello everyone, I've included below a report detailing the progress made on developing the plugin and the feed website for this week. Please note that the QEP concerning the license requirements is currently open. The deadline for su

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Regular paid positions for PR reviews

2023-12-08 Thread Alessandro Pasotti via QGIS-Developer
On Fri, Dec 8, 2023 at 9:22 AM Andreas Neumann wrote: > > Dear Alex, > > I support this idea. Code reviews are important. > > But I think we already do that - don't we? In 2023 there was this 14k € > budget that is currently being distributed between the core devs who are > actively reviewing on

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Regular paid positions for PR reviews

2023-12-08 Thread Andreas Neumann via QGIS-Developer
Dear Alex, I support this idea. Code reviews are important. But I think we already do that - don't we? In 2023 there was this 14k € budget that is currently being distributed between the core devs who are actively reviewing on Github. Next year, we plan to increase this budget to 20k. Are we mis