For a workaround I found that selecting this way:
SELECT
edit_id + 0 AS edit_id,
timestamp,
name
FROM
...
The +0 seem to makes QGIS (or GDAL?) unaware of edit_id being the PK
field and it does return it. Works both in 3.10 and 3.25.
Raymond
On 31-03-2022 18:15, Alessandro Pasotti w
> Offhand, there's a couple of ways to approach something like this:
> 1. You add appropriate signals in the core classes which are emitted
> at useful stages, e.g. "aboutToCalculateExtent",
> "extentCalculationProgressChanged", "extentCalculationComplete". And
> then the app/gui classes ca
Hi Alessandro,
Thanks for your reply. Will share data and a test script with you privately.
Raymond
On 31-03-2022 18:15, Alessandro Pasotti wrote:
Hi Raymond,
your code looks good.
Can you provide a test file?
There are some test in core here:
https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/blob/master/test
Hi Raymond,
your code looks good.
Can you provide a test file?
There are some test in core here:
https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/blob/master/tests/src/python/test_qgsproviderconnection_ogr_gpkg.py
On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 6:09 PM Raymond Nijssen via QGIS-Developer <
qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org>
Hi devs,
I'm working on a plugin that connects to a custom table (without
geometry) in a GPKG. When I'm sending queries to it, I keep on getting
unexpected results. Somehow the id field is missing, sometimes it
appears twice (!). And this seems to be different between QGIS 3.10 and
3.25. (I t
Hi All,
What would be a good practice to handle 3rd party libs which can't be
shipped together with a plugin?
I am looking for the most user-friendly way and have an idea.
But thought I would bounce it off the collective wisdom here and see if
there are other/better ways.
If we find a 'best'
Great.
Thanks Jürgen and Harrissou.
Alexandre
On Thu Mar 31, 2022, 10:19 AM GMT, DelazJ wrote:
Hi,
I've been chatting with Transifex guys for the docs and indeed, they made
me confirm that we want to 3.16 and 3.20 desktop resources. And as they
told you, Jürgen, they were supposed to do it and
Hi,
I've been chatting with Transifex guys for the docs and indeed, they made
me confirm that we want to 3.16 and 3.20 desktop resources. And as they
told you, Jürgen, they were supposed to do it and let us know.
Anyway, I asked them again last night about this. So let's give them few
days (again).
Hi Alexandre,
On Thu, 31. Mar 2022 at 02:58:45 -0700, Alexandre Neto wrote:
> Can I delete the 3-16 and 3-20 translation resources from transifex? they
> won't be used anymore and that way we avoid people translating it in vain.
No, their webinterface will just ignore you if you try. It has been
Hi Jurgen,
Can I delete the 3-16 and 3-20 translation resources from transifex? they
won't be used anymore and that way we avoid people translating it in vain.
Alexandre Neto
On Thu Mar 24, 2022, 10:13 PM GMT, Jürgen E. Fischer wrote:
Hi Alexandre,
On Thu, 24. Mar 2022 at 18:43:24 +, Alex
10 matches
Mail list logo
