Il giorno sab, 05/03/2011 alle 23.39 +0200, Tim Sutton ha scritto:
> just pick something :-) Now I've become kind of partial to the splash
> screen in trunk. It includes many people from the developer community,
> is aptly shaped as a Q to represent QGIS, and its kinda fun.
+1 - people during cou
Il giorno sab, 05/03/2011 alle 22.13 +0100, Borys Jurgiel ha scritto:
> > Can I proceed with fTools and GdalTools?
>
> Why not :)
I think the interested devs should cast their vote ;)
> I think also OSM Plugin deserves its own category (as many tickets
> as fTools).
Right, but I do not thin
Hi Ivan,
my Github user is gacarrillor, however, I have no experience with Git so
far.
BTW, I have posted the new version of the plugin as well as some new
comments [1].
Regards,
Germán
[1]
http://geotux.tuxfamily.org/index.php?option=com_myblog&task=view&id=27
Hi,
Thanks all for sharing your thought on this. I find this discussion very
stimulating! Obviously each solution has some advantages and some
disadvantages. Here are my comments on Martin's answer.
##
Martin wrote: "I think we all a
+1
On Mar 5, 2011, at 1:39 PM, Tim Sutton wrote:
> Yes folks its our favourite time again - the time when we get to argue
> about a name for the release and a topic for the splash. Of course
> usual rules apply - if nobody comes up with good suggestions, I'll
> just pick something :-) Now I've be
Yes folks its our favourite time again - the time when we get to argue
about a name for the release and a topic for the splash. Of course
usual rules apply - if nobody comes up with good suggestions, I'll
just pick something :-) Now I've become kind of partial to the splash
screen in trunk. It incl
> To me this is very simple: a category has a meaning as long as there is
> a maintainer for it.
> Therefore, please developers stand up and tell which area is of your
> interest, and I'll move the tickets as appropriate.
> Of course this does not guarantees in any way a faster resolution of
> tick
Hi Carson,
On Mar 5, 2011, at 11:28 AM, Carson Farmer wrote:
> Hi John, I believ José had problems with:
>
> - Geoprocessing tools available as Intersect two layers
Works for me.
> - Data management tools as Export to projection
Also works fine for me.
>> The only problem I had was with Merg
> The only downside I see here is that the symbols which are going to be
> use the effect of overpainting - like the roads with outlines - have
> to be split to bottom and top layer and applied in two different
> styles. But I think that is a relatively low price given the
> advantages. Finally, th
Hi John, I believ José had problems with:
- Geoprocessing tools available as Intersect two layers
- Data management tools as Export to projection
> The only problem I had was with Merge Shapefiles. If I tick the 'Select by
> layers in the folder', I cannot choose a folder in the dialog. The Ok b
Hi Mayeul
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 6:01 PM, wrote:
> Hi,
>
> (This follows this thread: Branch status for merge and release timeline
> proposal)
>
> Thanks for you answer Tim! I found the clarification useful and I appreciate
> your sense of diplomacy. Here are a few thoughts.
>
> You wrote: "I
Thanks for the update on this, Radim. I see that there will be some challenges
to work out with wms and reprojection. Thanks for you hard work and great dev
efforts,
John
On Mar 5, 2011, at 2:21 AM, Radim Blazek wrote:
> Hi,
> WMS reprojection should be fixed in sense that you get it rendered i
Which tools? Is the Browse button missing for the output, or nothing happens
when you click it?
I've seen odd Qt issues with different Qt versions and I have a couple builds I
can test.
On Mar 5, 2011, at 5:37 AM, Carson Farmer wrote:
> Hello Devs,
> A user (Dr. José Carlos Guerrero) has cont
Hello Devs,
A user (Dr. José Carlos Guerrero) has contacted me recently with a
problem that appears to stem from Qt dialogs on MacOS:
José is unable to specify output files from several of the fTools
tools where a save dialog should be popping up.
His install came from here: http://www.kyngchaos.
Il giorno sab, 05/03/2011 alle 10.17 +0100, Alessandro Pasotti ha
scritto:
> I cannot see dramatic advantages of an uploading function from within
> QGIS. BTW this could be quite easily done with a RPC call (RPC4Django
> handles this quite well).
I agree this is not the main point. The main thin
Hi,
WMS reprojection should be fixed in sense that you get it rendered in
the right place, but quality and even content is not the same like for
not project on the same scale. Of course.
To find the best resolution coefficient is one thing which has to be
done. Higher resolution in WMS request can
2011/3/5 Mayeul Kauffmann
> Paolo Cavallini wrote :
> > And of course we all want to manage all this through QGIS, without any
> > need for external programs (i.e. a browser).
>
> Hi,
> Maybe you are right so I'll speak for myself alone. Or maybe I did not
> even understood how the "Publish my pl
Paolo Cavallini wrote :
> And of course we all want to manage all this through QGIS, without any
> need for external programs (i.e. a browser).
Hi,
Maybe you are right so I'll speak for myself alone. Or maybe I did not
even understood how the "Publish my plugin" command will receive its
parameter
18 matches
Mail list logo
