Hi
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 9:27 AM, Paolo Cavallini wrote:
> Il giorno mar, 01/03/2011 alle 09.19 +0200, Tim Sutton ha scritto:
>> Are there any other major features people are working on that should
>> be considered for the release timeline? If the threading + globe
>
> Well, of course the raster
Il giorno mar, 01/03/2011 alle 09.19 +0200, Tim Sutton ha scritto:
> Are there any other major features people are working on that should
> be considered for the release timeline? If the threading + globe
Well, of course the raster provider/reprojection branch.
All the best.
--
http://www.faunal
Hi all especially Martin and Pirmin and those actively working on new features
I am just wondering how things are looking in terms of merging
branches. Is a merge of threaded rendering + 3d globe on the cards for
1.7 assuming we have a code freeze of around March 15? I'd like to get
1.7 out before
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 1:08 AM, Giuseppe Sucameli wrote:
> As far as there's some work to do before turning to the new symbology (some
> features work
> in old symbology but are still missing in the new one), but also the new
> labelling needs
> some work (and maybe diagrams??), why don't we inse
2011/2/28 Germán Carrillo :
> Hi Martin,
> I would like to propose a couple of Python snippets to be included in the
> PyQGIS Cookbook.
> 1) Load of MySQL geometries:
> 2) Graduated symbol renderer (Old symbology):
Hi German,
thank you for the snippets. Would you mind to spend few more minutes
w
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 10:59 AM, Tim Sutton wrote:
> That being the case, I would suggest we poll Marco and other devs to
> see if it can move into trunk so that it can be more broadly tested
> before the release - I don't think it will be good to merge it at the
> last minute before the release
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 9:01 AM, Radim Blazek wrote:
>
> BTW: The approximate reprojection could may be used also for vectors?
>
> Radim
Definitely. On-the-fly reprojection of vector layers takes ages, there
are no approximations right now.
Martin
___
Hi,
thanks for testing, I'll look at WMS again and let you know.
Openlayers are implemented as a plugin, not provider, they will not
become automatically reprojected.
Radim
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 1:12 AM, John C. Tull wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was testing a little today. It appears that WMS layers ar
Hi
I'm not able to connect to Postgis with r15282:
"Connection to soverify on localhost failed. Either the database is down
or your settings are incorrect.
Check your username and password and try again.
The database said:
invalid connection option "application_name"
regards
Stefan
Mit fr
Try setting the layer editable and then turning editing off. There seems
(too me) to be a bug in the refreshing of the attributes on memory layers.
- Nathan
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 10:50 PM, Ziegler Stefan wrote:
> Hi
>
> I'm trying to add some attributes to a memory provider but with no luck.
Hi
I'm trying to add some attributes to a memory provider but with no luck.
I pasted the code from the cookbook [1] into the python console. The
layer with the feature is added but there are no attributes in the
layer. Did I miss something? Has something changed?
[1]: http://www.qgis.org/pyqgis-
On Mon, 2011-02-21 at 13:53 +, Giovanni Manghi wrote:
> Hi Martin,
>
> > it would be good if you could pick e.g. one hostel and one hotel for
> > us which are preferred, so that the number of locations where people
> > stay is minimized. It is simpler and more pleasant when you can meet
> > wi
Hi
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 10:01 AM, Radim Blazek wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 9:54 PM, Tim Sutton wrote:
>> Do you have anything else left on your todo list before you can merge to
>> trunk?
>
> It looks like this:
> qgsrasterprojector.* qgsrasterdataprovider.* raster/qgsrasterlayer.* : 60
Hi all,
Paolo told me that there are devs are having problems finding low cost
flights to Lisbon.
>From what I see this morning there are still direct flight at around
100/150 euros from many European cities with Easyjet (Geneve, London,
Paris, Rome, Milan, etc.).
If you don't find any easyjet d
On 27-2-2011 22:01, Martin Dobias wrote:
On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 12:52 PM, Barend Gehrels wrote:
I can imagine the API is not binary compatible for some upgrades (usually
it
is extended so then still compatible, depending on the model used). Is
there
not a mechanism to check if a plugin corre
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 9:54 PM, Tim Sutton wrote:
> Do you have anything else left on your todo list before you can merge to
> trunk?
It looks like this:
qgsrasterprojector.* qgsrasterdataprovider.* raster/qgsrasterlayer.* : 60 TODOs
qgsgdalprovider.*: 11 TODOs
qgsgrassrasterprovider.*: 8 TODOs
16 matches
Mail list logo
