Re: PASST networking with onboard NIC

2024-11-14 Thread Laurent Vivier
On 14/11/2024 17:44, Lytle, Ben wrote: Hello, Laurent! Hi Ben, I have a question about the proper way to use passt networking with a machine's onboard NIC (ie. without specifying a |-device|). Is there a way to connect |-netdev stream,id=net0,server=off,addr.type=unix,addr.path=/ tmp/passt

PASST networking with onboard NIC

2024-11-14 Thread Lytle, Ben
Hello, Laurent! I have a question about the proper way to use passt networking with a machine's onboard NIC (ie. without specifying a -device). Is there a way to connect -netdev stream,id=net0,server=off,addr.type=unix,addr.path=/tmp/passt_1.socket to an onboard nic using -nic ? Thanks! Ben

Re: PASST networking with onboard NIC

2024-11-14 Thread Lytle, Ben
>> I have a question about the proper way to use passt networking with a >> machine's onboard >> NIC (ie. without specifying a |-device|). >> Is there a way to connect |-netdev >> stream,id=net0,server=off,addr.type=unix,addr.path=/ >> tmp/passt_1.socket| to an onboard nic using |-nic| ? > > No,

Re: "relaxed" `-hda file.qcow2` equivalent ?

2024-11-14 Thread lacsaP Patatetom
Le jeu. 14 nov. 2024 à 15:11, lacsaP Patatetom a écrit : > hi, > what is the "relaxed" equivalent of the `-hda file.qcow2` command line > argument to control file locking (`locking=off`) ? > the documentation says that `-hda a` can be replaced by `-drive file=a` > and that locking can be controll

Re: "relaxed" `-hda file.qcow2` equivalent ?

2024-11-14 Thread lacsaP Patatetom
Le jeu. 14 nov. 2024 à 16:15, lacsaP Patatetom a écrit : > Le jeu. 14 nov. 2024 à 15:11, lacsaP Patatetom a > écrit : > >> hi, >> what is the "relaxed" equivalent of the `-hda file.qcow2` command line >> argument to control file locking (`locking=off`) ? >> the documentation says that `-hda a` c

Re: "relaxed" `-hda file.qcow2` equivalent ?

2024-11-14 Thread lacsaP Patatetom
Le jeu. 14 nov. 2024 à 15:11, lacsaP Patatetom a écrit : > hi, > what is the "relaxed" equivalent of the `-hda file.qcow2` command line > argument to control file locking (`locking=off`) ? > the documentation says that `-hda a` can be replaced by `-drive file=a` > and that locking can be controll

Re: "relaxed" `-hda file.qcow2` equivalent ?

2024-11-14 Thread Frantisek Rysanek
> my image `fie.qcow2` is mounted elsewhere (nbd) and running > `qemu-system-x86_64 -snapshot -hda file.qcow2` fails with the error > "qemu-system-x86_64: -hda usb1.disk: Failed to get shared “write” > lock / Is another process using the image [usb1.disk] ?". Oh... So you want concurrent access t

Re: "relaxed" `-hda file.qcow2` equivalent ?

2024-11-14 Thread Frantisek Rysanek
> > hi, > what is the "relaxed" equivalent of the `-hda file.qcow2` command line > argument to control file locking (`locking=off`) ? the documentation > says that `-hda a` can be replaced by `-drive file=a` and that locking > can be controlled with the `locking` option of the `blockdev` argument

"relaxed" `-hda file.qcow2` equivalent ?

2024-11-14 Thread lacsaP Patatetom
hi, what is the "relaxed" equivalent of the `-hda file.qcow2` command line argument to control file locking (`locking=off`) ? the documentation says that `-hda a` can be replaced by `-drive file=a` and that locking can be controlled with the `locking` option of the `blockdev` argument : how to link