On 6/4/2014 8:25 PM, p_j_r_m wrote:
So it seems acceleration is possible...
why do you say "use a 64 bit Linux kernel"?
Why can´t I use a i386 kernel ? would be a better performance on x86_64
machine ?
Thank you very much.
The kvm module uses a 64 bit mechanism in the x86_64 instruction set,
On 26 May 2014 07:15, Mallikarjun Goudar wrote:
> Hi,
> I built an "'hello world" application using aarch64-none-elf-gcc (linaro gcc
> tools). And I tried to run generated elf using following command:
>
> qemu-system-aarch64 -M virt -cpu cortex-a57 -nographic -serial null
> -monitor null -semihos
On 28 May 2014 09:58, Radu Velea wrote:
> I've been using QEMU in user mode to run an executable with debug mode and
> I've noticed that the number of assembly instructions differs from one
> runtime to another, even for a trivial "hello world". Is there an
> explanation for this?
>
> qemu-aarch64
On 4 June 2014 17:32, Waldemar Brodkorb wrote:
> I am trying qemu-system-i386 -alt-grab and -ctrl-grab
> on MacOS X Maverick, but both are ignored in Qemu 2.0.0.
>
> On Linux I at least get:
> -alt-grab and -ctrl-grab are only valid for SDL, ignoring option
>
> So I need to recompile qemu with SDL
So! I've corrected the configuration of my Ceph cluster and am now getting
about 70MB/s writes and 85MB/s reads inside VM's backed by rbd volumes.
Generally performance of these machines "feels" quite good, which supports
the consistent results I'm getting from iozone, dbench, and dd [1].
However,
