On Wed, 07/27 15:17, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 09:34:25AM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 06:35:30PM +, Yehuda Yitschak wrote:
> > > Thanks a lot for the detailed answer
> > >
> > > I managed to run virtio-scsi and i am benchmarking the perf
On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 09:34:25AM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 06:35:30PM +, Yehuda Yitschak wrote:
> > Thanks a lot for the detailed answer
> >
> > I managed to run virtio-scsi and i am benchmarking the performance
> >
> > just curios, does virtio-scsi deliver ab
On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 06:35:30PM +, Yehuda Yitschak wrote:
> Thanks a lot for the detailed answer
>
> I managed to run virtio-scsi and i am benchmarking the performance
>
> just curios, does virtio-scsi deliver about the same performance as
> vhost-scsi ?
Both virtio-scsi and vhost-scsi
Hi Stefan
Thanks a lot for the detailed answer
I managed to run virtio-scsi and i am benchmarking the performance
just curios, does virtio-scsi deliver about the same performance as vhost-scsi
?
i was surprised to learn that vhost-scsi isn't widely used.
i thought vhost-scsi should be the fa
> i figured out how to use virtio-blk but i can't find any reference on
> how to use vhost scsi
Back in 2012 I used the following host CD-ROM passthrough script for
testing. Nowadays I would suggest looking into targetcli
(http://linux-iscsi.org/wiki/Targetcli) instead of poking configfs
directly
Hello Everyone
I am trying the compare the performance of virtio-blk, vhost-scsi, and native
host on a SATA3 SSD.
i figured out how to use virtio-blk but i can't find any reference on how to
use vhost scsi
i figured i probably need to use "-device virtio-scsi" but other than that i
couldn'
