Cool.
If the merge really has completed, that's good to know.
Tony
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 8:34 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 19 August 2014 16:26, Tony Su wrote:
>> According to the qemu-kvm page,
>> http://wiki.qemu.org/KVM
>>
>> The upstream merging is still in progress.
>
> That page says "
Why are you using e1000 and not virtio? The virtio drives have
significantly better performance Ubuntu should also have native
support for them.
On 8/17/2014 10:34 PM, JHM wrote:
Salutations to all members, first off. This is my first post in the
discussion group.
I searched for this to
On 18 August 2014 07:09, Tony Su wrote:
> Unless someone says differently,
> I believe that doesn't change the likely fact that the main KVM is
> different than what you are doing and would perform much better.
No, Julio is correct. The KVM functionality was all merged
into upstream QEMU, and th
Unless someone says differently,
I believe that doesn't change the likely fact that the main KVM is
different than what you are doing and would perform much better.
Tony
On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 8:09 PM, JHM wrote:
> Sorry, I'm taking my first steps with qemu here. The man page for kvm tells
> m
Salutations to all members, first off. This is my first post in the
discussion group.
I searched for this topic, but not much turned up from the archive here.
Searching for "slow"
http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/cgi-bin/namazu.cgi?query=slow&submit=Search!&idxname=qemu-discuss&max=100&result=norm
