On 1 August 2018 at 04:11, microsoft gaofei wrote:
> One more question, is that safe to run QEMU as root user?
Well, define "safe". By running as root you're reducing
the number of barriers to bad things happening if either
(a) QEMU has a bug (for instance, a bug that allows
malicious code inside
I got the email; thank you all for helping me!
On Wed, Aug 1, 2018 at 3:15 AM Laurent Vivier wrote:
> Le 01/08/2018 à 11:03, Thomas Huth a écrit :
> > On 07/28/2018 06:29 PM, Tom A wrote:
> ...
> > I'm a little bit surprised that we do not have an entry for x86_64 there
> > yet. Maybe Laurent or
Thank you, that clarifies things!
- TB
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On August 1, 2018 12:09 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 1 August 2018 at 15:09, TB tim.black...@pm.me wrote:
>
> > New QEMU user here, reaching out for some clarification
> > on the “-dtb” and “-device” flags. How can I tell
> QEMU is unable to switch to full screen mode in TWM(Tom's Window Manager),
> but is able to do so in JWM.
> One more question, is that safe to run QEMU as root user? Using root is not
> safe, such as, when mis-running rm -rf /
I'm not familiar with your window manager issues but I can say th
On 1 August 2018 at 15:09, TB wrote:
> New QEMU user here, reaching out for some clarification
>on the “-dtb” and “-device” flags. How can I tell QEMU to
>map a device I specify with the “-device” flag to a
>specific memory region that I know about from the Device
>Tree Blob (DTB) file?
You can't
Hi all,
New QEMU user here, reaching out for some clarification on the “-dtb” and
“-device” flags. How can I tell QEMU to map a device I specify with the
“-device” flag to a specific memory region that I know about from the Device
Tree Blob (DTB) file?
For example, the DTB for a kernel I’m att
QEMU is unable to switch to full screen mode in TWM(Tom's Window Manager), but
is able to do so in JWM.
One more question, is that safe to run QEMU as root user? Using root is not
safe, such as, when mis-running rm -rf /
Le 01/08/2018 à 11:03, Thomas Huth a écrit :
> On 07/28/2018 06:29 PM, Tom A wrote:
...
> I'm a little bit surprised that we do not have an entry for x86_64 there
> yet. Maybe Laurent or Riku know why it is not there yet...
>
I've got a patch for that. Until recently I only tested on x86_64 host,
On 07/28/2018 06:29 PM, Tom A wrote:
> Hello Everyone,
>
> Hopefully, I am posting in the right place. I normally don't use a mailing
> list. Anyway, I was wondering if anyone here knows what the magic and mask
> values are for an x86_64 Linux binary file.
>
> My goal is to run a chroot x86_64 en
I try 'qemu-kvm-ev-2.10.0-21.el7_5.4.1.x86_64'.
And open bug report:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1610461
On 31.07.2018 13:46, Nerijus Baliūnas wrote:
> 2018-07-31 13:35, utdilya rašė:
>> Thank you.
>> This is solution not working for me. Maybe, because of Centos7.
>> I have in th
10 matches
Mail list logo
