On 20.06.2018 08:15, Edward Smith wrote:
> Great, thanks Thomas!
>
> Apparently I was missing the 0x3353C9CE prefix from my key search. What
> is that exactly?
It's the longer form of the key ID. The 32-bit-only key IDs are not safe
anymore these days, see https://evil32.com/ for details.
> Also
Great, thanks Thomas!
Apparently I was missing the 0x3353C9CE prefix from my key search. What is
that exactly?
Also, I got this output from verifying with this key:
gpg: Signature made Tue 24 Apr 2018 12:55:16 PM CDT using RSA key ID
F108B584
gpg: Good signature from "Michael Roth "
gpg:
On 20.06.2018 06:19, Edward Smith wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I downloaded the following files to my Ubuntu machine:
>
> Jun 19 22:37 qemu-2.12.0.tar.xz
> Jun 19 22:37 qemu-2.12.0.tar.xz.sig
>
> I then attempted to verify the gpg signature of the qemu-2.12.0.tar.xz file
> and got the following output:
>
Hello,
I downloaded the following files to my Ubuntu machine:
Jun 19 22:37 qemu-2.12.0.tar.xz
Jun 19 22:37 qemu-2.12.0.tar.xz.sig
I then attempted to verify the gpg signature of the qemu-2.12.0.tar.xz file
and got the following output:
gpg: Signature made Tue 24 Apr 2018 12:55:16 PM CDT using R
