> Please document what this does.
okay, i will.
> So this will return false if ring has any available buffers?
> Equivalent to:
>
> bool virtio_queue_set_notification_and_check(VirtQueue *vq, int enable)
> {
>virtio_queue_packed_set_notification(vq, enable);
> return virtio_queue_e
adow_avail_wrap_counter))*
*return true;*
On Tue, Jul 2, 2024 at 2:46 AM Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 02, 2024 at 01:18:15AM +0800, Yang Dongshan wrote:
> > > Please document what this does.
> > okay, i will.
> >
> > > So this will return f
queue since that value
>was returned.
I'm not clear about the purpose of virtqueue_poll(), when will the function
return?
Do you mean that loop in virtqueue_poll() till new buffers become available?
> accordingly, virtio_queue_set_notification_and_check
> will accept this opaq
hi,
subject should list the affected component, and be shorter.
ok, I will rewrite the subject:
"update the latest available idx seen by the host to event idx"
Fixes: 06b12970174 ("virtio-net: fix network stall under load")
this should come at the end.
I have submitted v2, it's at the end now.
y, should I add an API to
get the shadow idx as virtio_queue_set_notification_and_check()
needs the opaque arg.
What value should return from virtqueue_get_avail_bytes() in case of
error branch in the function?
On 2024/7/2, 19:27, "Michael S. Tsirkin" mailto:m...@redhat.com>> wrote:
On Tue, Jul 02, 2024 at 07:4
irectly and change the function name to
virtio_queue_set_notification_and_check_shadow()?
On 2024/7/4, 19:24, "Michael S. Tsirkin" mailto:m...@redhat.com>> wrote:
On Thu, Jul 04, 2024 at 10:20:15AM +, Yang Dongshan wrote:
> Hi, Michael
>
> > My suggestion:
> >
> >
> >
> > static int virtio_net_has_buffers(VirtIONetQueue *q, int bufsize)
> > {
> > + int shadow_idx;
> > + unsigned int in_bytes;
> > VirtIONet *n = q->n;
> > - if (virtio_queue_empty(q->rx_vq) ||
> > - (n->mergeable_rx_bufs &&
> > - !virtqueue_avail_bytes(q->rx_vq, bufsize, 0))) {
> > - virtio_queue_
hi, Alex
> Where's the kernel patch that implements the MMIO map flag. That needs
> to come first.
The kernel patch is on the way, I have submitted patch to linux kernel,
waiting for review.
Patch link:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250117071423.469880-1-east.moutain.y...@gmail.com/
> I al
> Yes. This patch should also be divided in 4 parts :
>
> - kernel header changes with links to the threads modifying the kernel.
> - common part,
> - vpda part,
> - and vfio,
ok, I will divide it into 4 patches.
thanks Cédric
On Fri, Jan 17, 2025 at 2:15 AM Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> >>
