[Qemu-devel] [Bug 1036645] Re: /usr/bin/xargs: rm: Argument list too long during make distclean in cross chroot

2013-01-11 Thread Tom Rini
I see this with Ubuntu 12.04 inside of an armhf chroot. Running 'make deb-pkg' also exposes this issue ** Project changed: qemu => qemu-linaro (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of qemu- devel-ml, which is subscribed to QEMU. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/

Re: [PATCH v6 0/7] Resolve issues with booting distros on x86

2024-04-11 Thread Tom Rini
On Thu, 04 Jan 2024 08:10:35 -0700, Simon Glass wrote: > This little series reprises the EFI-video fix, fixes a USB problem and > enables a boot script for coreboot. > > It also moves to truetype fonts for coreboot and qemu-x86, since the > menus look much better and there are no strong size cons

Re: [PATCH v5 06/26] arm: qemu: Add a devicetree file for qemu_arm64

2021-11-01 Thread Tom Rini
On Mon, Nov 01, 2021 at 06:33:35PM +0100, François Ozog wrote: > Hi Simon > > Le lun. 1 nov. 2021 à 17:58, Simon Glass a écrit : > > > Hi Peter, > > > > On Mon, 1 Nov 2021 at 04:48, Peter Maydell > > wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, 26 Oct 2021 at 01:33, Simon Glass wrote: > > > > > > > > Add this f

Re: [PATCH v5 06/26] arm: qemu: Add a devicetree file for qemu_arm64

2021-11-02 Thread Tom Rini
On Tue, Nov 02, 2021 at 08:59:45AM -0600, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi François, > > On Mon, 1 Nov 2021 at 11:33, François Ozog wrote: > > > > Hi Simon > > > > Le lun. 1 nov. 2021 à 17:58, Simon Glass a écrit : > >> > >> Hi Peter, > >> > >> On Mon, 1 Nov 2021 at 04:48, Peter Maydell > >> wrote: > >

Re: [PATCH v5 06/26] arm: qemu: Add a devicetree file for qemu_arm64

2021-11-02 Thread Tom Rini
On Tue, Nov 02, 2021 at 09:00:53AM -0600, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi Tom, > > On Mon, 1 Nov 2021 at 12:07, Tom Rini wrote: > > > > On Mon, Nov 01, 2021 at 06:33:35PM +0100, François Ozog wrote: > > > Hi Simon > > > > > > Le lun. 1 nov. 2021 à 17:5

Re: [PATCH v5 06/26] arm: qemu: Add a devicetree file for qemu_arm64

2021-11-03 Thread Tom Rini
On Tue, Nov 02, 2021 at 07:29:54PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi Tom, > > On Tue, 2 Nov 2021 at 11:28, Tom Rini wrote: > > > > On Tue, Nov 02, 2021 at 09:00:53AM -0600, Simon Glass wrote: > > > Hi Tom, > > > > > > On Mon, 1 Nov 2021 at 12:07,

Re: [PATCH v5 06/26] arm: qemu: Add a devicetree file for qemu_arm64

2021-11-03 Thread Tom Rini
On Tue, Nov 02, 2021 at 07:32:54PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi Tom, > > On Tue, 2 Nov 2021 at 10:57, Tom Rini wrote: > > > > On Tue, Nov 02, 2021 at 08:59:45AM -0600, Simon Glass wrote: > > > Hi François, > > > > > > On Mon, 1 Nov 2021 at 11:33,

Re: [PATCH v5 06/26] arm: qemu: Add a devicetree file for qemu_arm64

2021-11-03 Thread Tom Rini
On Wed, Nov 03, 2021 at 06:29:20AM +0100, François Ozog wrote: [snip] > > 3. Anything else? > > > > For qemu_arm_spl, it *does not boot* unless the U-Boot SPL properties > > are present. There is no easy way to fix this. > > one clean and easy way would be to upstream a Qemu change to merge a > su

Re: [PATCH v5 00/26] fdt: Make OF_BOARD a boolean option

2021-11-03 Thread Tom Rini
On Tue, Nov 02, 2021 at 07:20:51PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi Mark, > > On Wed, 27 Oct 2021 at 16:30, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > > > > From: Simon Glass > > > Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2021 12:23:21 -0600 > > > > > > Hi François, > > > > > > On Wed, 27 Oct 2021 at 09:14, François Ozog > > > wrote: >

Re: [PATCH v5 00/26] fdt: Make OF_BOARD a boolean option

2021-11-03 Thread Tom Rini
On Wed, Nov 03, 2021 at 09:22:58AM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > From: Simon Glass > > Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2021 19:20:51 -0600 > > > > Hi Mark, > > > > On Wed, 27 Oct 2021 at 16:30, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > > > > > > From: Simon Glass > > > > Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2021 12:23:21 -0600 > > > > > > >

Re: [PATCH v5 00/26] fdt: Make OF_BOARD a boolean option

2021-11-03 Thread Tom Rini
On Wed, Nov 03, 2021 at 10:45:11AM -0600, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi Tom, > > On Wed, 27 Oct 2021 at 13:25, Tom Rini wrote: > > > > On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 12:23:21PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote: > > > Hi François, > > > > > > On Wed, 2

Re: [PATCH 00/16] fdt: Make OF_BOARD a boolean option

2021-10-27 Thread Tom Rini
On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 12:03:44PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi all, > > On Thu, 14 Oct 2021 at 09:28, Tom Rini wrote: > > > > On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 09:17:52AM -0600, Simon Glass wrote: > > > Hi Tom, > > > > > > On Thu, 14 Oct 2021 at 08:56,

Re: [PATCH 00/16] fdt: Make OF_BOARD a boolean option

2021-10-27 Thread Tom Rini
On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 09:46:38AM +0300, Ilias Apalodimas wrote: > Hi Simon, > > A bit late to the party, sorry! > > [...] > > > > > > > I really want to see what the binary case looks like since we could then > > > kill off rpi_{3,3_b,4}_defconfig and I would need to see if we could > > > then

Re: [PATCH 00/16] fdt: Make OF_BOARD a boolean option

2021-10-27 Thread Tom Rini
On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 03:30:18PM +0200, François Ozog wrote: > Hi Tom, > > On Wed, 27 Oct 2021 at 14:59, Tom Rini wrote: > > > On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 09:46:38AM +0300, Ilias Apalodimas wrote: > > > Hi Simon, > > >

Re: [PATCH 00/16] fdt: Make OF_BOARD a boolean option

2021-10-27 Thread Tom Rini
On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 04:47:55PM +0300, Ilias Apalodimas wrote: > Hi trying to reply to all at the same time! > > On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 09:38:40AM -0400, Tom Rini wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 03:30:18PM +0200, François Ozog wrote: > > > Hi Tom, > > > &

Re: [PATCH 00/16] fdt: Make OF_BOARD a boolean option

2021-10-27 Thread Tom Rini
On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 03:48:48PM +0200, François Ozog wrote: > On Wed, 27 Oct 2021 at 15:38, Tom Rini wrote: > > > On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 03:30:18PM +0200, François Ozog wrote: > > > Hi Tom, > > > > > > On Wed, 27 Oct 2021 at 14:59, Tom Rini wrote: >

Re: [PATCH 00/16] fdt: Make OF_BOARD a boolean option

2021-10-27 Thread Tom Rini
On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 03:23:01PM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote: [snip] > One passed to U-Boot for fixups and further passed to the OS. This > devicetree may originate from a prior boot stage, from a file loaded by > U-Boot, or from a later bootstage, e.g systemd-boot's devicetree command. I

Re: [PATCH 00/16] fdt: Make OF_BOARD a boolean option

2021-10-27 Thread Tom Rini
On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 03:15:01PM +0200, François Ozog wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, 27 Oct 2021 at 14:48, Tom Rini wrote: > > > On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 12:03:44PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > On Thu, 14 Oct 2021 at 09:28, Tom Rini

Re: [PATCH 05/16] arm: qemu: Add a devicetree file for qemu_arm64

2021-10-27 Thread Tom Rini
On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 03:44:08PM +0100, Alex Bennée wrote: > > François Ozog writes: > > > Hi Simon > > > > The only place I could agree with this file presence is in the > > documentation directory, not in dts. It creates a mental picture for the > > reader > > an entirely bad mind scheme

Re: [PATCH 00/16] fdt: Make OF_BOARD a boolean option

2021-10-27 Thread Tom Rini
On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 05:02:39PM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote: > On 10/27/21 16:55, Tom Rini wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 03:23:01PM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote: > > > > [snip] > > > One passed to U-Boot for fixups and further passed to the OS. This

Re: [PATCH 00/16] fdt: Make OF_BOARD a boolean option

2021-10-27 Thread Tom Rini
On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 09:24:25AM -0600, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi Mark, > > On Wed, 27 Oct 2021 at 09:11, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > > > > From: François Ozog > > > Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2021 15:15:01 +0200 > > > > > > Hi, > > > > >

Re: [PATCH 05/16] arm: qemu: Add a devicetree file for qemu_arm64

2021-10-27 Thread Tom Rini
On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 12:34:26PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi all, > > On Wed, 27 Oct 2021 at 08:56, Tom Rini wrote: > > > > On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 03:44:08PM +0100, Alex Bennée wrote: > > > > > > François Ozog writes: > > > > > >

Re: [PATCH v5 00/26] fdt: Make OF_BOARD a boolean option

2021-10-27 Thread Tom Rini
On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 08:08:19AM -0600, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi François, > > On Tue, 26 Oct 2021 at 00:07, François Ozog wrote: > > > > Hi Simon > > > > Position unchanged on this series: adding fake dts for boards that generate > > their device tree in the dts directory is not good. If you

Re: [PATCH v5 00/26] fdt: Make OF_BOARD a boolean option

2021-10-27 Thread Tom Rini
On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 08:08:19AM -0600, Simon Glass wrote: [snip] > But trying to do any driver / core work for a board where you don't > have the devicetree is currently not possible. The devicetree is a > core component and being unable to modify it is simply not practical. > We are talking he

Re: [PATCH 00/16] fdt: Make OF_BOARD a boolean option

2021-10-27 Thread Tom Rini
On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 06:02:19PM +0200, François Ozog wrote: > Hi Mark, > > On Wed, 27 Oct 2021 at 17:10, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > > > From: François Ozog > > > Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2021 15:15:01 +0200 > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > &g

Re: [PATCH v5 00/26] fdt: Make OF_BOARD a boolean option

2021-10-27 Thread Tom Rini
On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 06:36:12PM +0300, Tuomas Tynkkynen wrote: > Hi, > > On 27.10.2021 17.08, Simon Glass wrote: > > Hi François, > > > > On Tue, 26 Oct 2021 at 00:07, François Ozog > > wrote: > > > > > > Hi Simon > > > > > > Position unchanged on this series: adding fake dts for boards th

Re: [PATCH v5 00/26] fdt: Make OF_BOARD a boolean option

2021-10-27 Thread Tom Rini
On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 12:23:21PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi François, > > On Wed, 27 Oct 2021 at 09:14, François Ozog wrote: > > > > > > > > On Wed, 27 Oct 2021 at 16:08, Simon Glass wrote: > >> > >> Hi François, > >> > >> On Tue, 26 Oct 2021 at 00:07, François Ozog > >> wrote: > >> > >

Re: [PATCH 00/16] fdt: Make OF_BOARD a boolean option

2021-10-28 Thread Tom Rini
On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 12:00:44AM +0200, François Ozog wrote: > Hi Tom > > Le mer. 27 oct. 2021 à 21:06, Tom Rini a écrit : > > > On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 06:02:19PM +0200, François Ozog wrote: > > > Hi Mark, > > > > > > On Wed, 2

Re: [PATCH 00/16] fdt: Make OF_BOARD a boolean option

2021-10-12 Thread Tom Rini
On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 09:29:14AM +0800, Bin Meng wrote: > Hi Simon, > > On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 9:01 AM Simon Glass wrote: > > > > With Ilias' efforts we have dropped OF_PRIOR_STAGE and OF_HOSTFILE so > > there are only three ways to obtain a devicetree: > > > >- OF_SEPARATE - the normal wa

Re: [PATCH 02/16] arm: qemu: Explain how to extract the generate devicetree

2021-10-13 Thread Tom Rini
On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 10:58:31AM -0600, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi François, > > On Tue, 12 Oct 2021 at 19:20, François Ozog wrote: > > > > > > > > Le mer. 13 oct. 2021 à 03:02, Simon Glass a écrit : > >> > >> QEMU currently generates a devicetree for use with U-Boot. Explain how to > >> obtain i

Re: [PATCH 00/16] fdt: Make OF_BOARD a boolean option

2021-10-14 Thread Tom Rini
On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 12:06:02PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi François, > > On Wed, 13 Oct 2021 at 11:35, François Ozog wrote: > > > > Hi Simon > > > > Le mer. 13 oct. 2021 à 16:49, Simon Glass a écrit : > >> > >> Hi Tom, Bin,François, >

Re: [PATCH 00/16] fdt: Make OF_BOARD a boolean option

2021-10-14 Thread Tom Rini
On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 09:17:52AM -0600, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi Tom, > > On Thu, 14 Oct 2021 at 08:56, Tom Rini wrote: > > > > On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 12:06:02PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote: > > > Hi François, > > > > > > On Wed, 1

[Qemu-devel] qemu-system-sh4 vs qemu-system-arm/i386 default behavior

2016-11-29 Thread Tom Rini
Hey all, I'm trying to make use of the r2d platform for U-Boot testing via QEMU. After applying a series[1] I can use the kernel.org sh4 toolchain to get a u-boot.bin that runs, mostly. I say mostly as first of all I have to pass "-monitor null -serial null -serial stdio -nographic" to qemu-syste

Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu-system-sh4 vs qemu-system-arm/i386 default behavior

2016-11-30 Thread Tom Rini
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 10:12:09AM +0100, Thomas Huth wrote: > On 30.11.2016 09:02, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > On 2016-11-30 08:33, Thomas Huth wrote: > >> On 30.11.2016 02:01, Tom Rini wrote: > >>> Hey all, > >>> > >>> I'm trying

Re: [PATCH v2 00/28] x86: Improve operation under QEMU

2025-02-16 Thread Tom Rini
On Sun, Feb 16, 2025 at 01:43:45PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote: > U-Boot can start and boot an OS in both qemu-x86 and qemu-x86_64 but it > is not perfect. > > With both builds, executing the VESA ROM causes an intermittent hang, at > least on some AMD CPUs. > > With qemu-x86_64 kvm cannot be used

Re: [PATCH v3 00/44] x86: Improve operation under QEMU

2025-02-25 Thread Tom Rini
On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 04:05:49PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote: > U-Boot can start and boot an OS in both qemu-x86 and qemu-x86_64 but it > is not perfect. > > With both builds, executing the VESA ROM causes an intermittent hang, at > least on some AMD CPUs. > > With qemu-x86_64 kvm cannot be used

Re: [PATCH v2 00/28] x86: Improve operation under QEMU

2025-02-17 Thread Tom Rini
On Mon, Feb 17, 2025 at 06:14:12AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi Tom, > > On Sun, 16 Feb 2025 at 14:57, Tom Rini wrote: > > > > On Sun, Feb 16, 2025 at 01:43:45PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote: > > > > > U-Boot can start and boot an OS in both qemu-x86 and qem

Re: [PATCH v4 00/47] x86: Improve operation under QEMU

2025-03-07 Thread Tom Rini
On Thu, Mar 06, 2025 at 09:03:27AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote: > U-Boot can start and boot an OS in both qemu-x86 and qemu-x86_64 but it > is not perfect. > > With both builds, executing the VESA ROM causes an intermittent hang, at > least on some AMD CPUs. > > With qemu-x86_64 kvm cannot be used

Re: [PATCH v4 00/47] x86: Improve operation under QEMU

2025-03-14 Thread Tom Rini
On Fri, Mar 14, 2025 at 02:44:35PM +, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi Tom, > > On Fri, 7 Mar 2025 at 14:23, Tom Rini wrote: > > > > On Thu, Mar 06, 2025 at 09:03:27AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote: > > > > > U-Boot can start and boot an OS in both qemu-x86 and qem

Re: [PATCH v4 00/47] x86: Improve operation under QEMU

2025-03-15 Thread Tom Rini
On Sat, Mar 15, 2025 at 12:54:25PM +, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi Tom, > > On Fri, 14 Mar 2025 at 16:06, Tom Rini wrote: > > > > On Fri, Mar 14, 2025 at 02:44:35PM +, Simon Glass wrote: > > > Hi Tom, > > > > > > On Fri, 7 Mar 2025 at 14:23,

Re: [PATCH v5 00/46] x86: Improve operation under QEMU

2025-04-05 Thread Tom Rini
On Sat, Mar 15, 2025 at 02:25:20PM +, Simon Glass wrote: > U-Boot can start and boot an OS in both qemu-x86 and qemu-x86_64 but it > is not perfect. > > With both builds, executing the VESA ROM causes an intermittent hang, at > least on some AMD CPUs. > > With qemu-x86_64 kvm cannot be used