Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: hosting the forum

2006-10-06 Thread Michael Renzmann
> On Wednesday 04 October 2006 11:00 am, Ottavio Caruso wrote: > I am a fan of a qemu-user mailing list Personally, I'd also prefer a mailing list over a forum. Just to mention it :) Bye, Mike ___ Qemu-devel mailing list Qemu-devel@nongnu.org http://

[Qemu-devel] PCI access virtualization

2006-01-05 Thread Michael Renzmann
Hi all. Disclaimer: I'm quite new to things like virtual machines, and even half-baked when it comes to QEMU. I'm aware that my idea might be absurd, but still it's worth a try :) I'm wondering if it would be possible to modify QEMU such that VMs could access PCI devices on the host system. And,

Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Qemu-devel Digest, Vol 34, Issue 8

2006-01-06 Thread Michael Renzmann
Hi. On Thu, 2006-01-05 at 23:24 -0700, Josè Gerardo Gonzàlez Jimènez wrote: > Hi, i'm new on this list... bus i have a suggestion, is not ease > read mails with 100 lines of code... It would be easier for you if you'd switch away from digest mode. That way you would get every single mail as su

Re: [Qemu-devel] Interest in hardware plugin functionality

2006-01-09 Thread Michael Renzmann
Hi. On Mon, 2006-01-09 at 17:38 -0800, Andre Pech wrote: > I change a hardware simulation, I instead patched qemu to support > dynamically loading hardware plugin files at run time. > [...] > I am more than willing to put all the effort into turning this into a > nice patch, if there is a maintain

Re: [Qemu-devel] Set SO_REUSEADDR at the right time

2006-01-22 Thread Michael Renzmann
Hi. On Sun, 2006-01-22 at 15:32 -0800, John R. Hogerhuis wrote: > FYI, Fabrice has a hard enough time tracking patches. That sounds familiar. We (MadWifi, that is) had similar problems about half a year ago. Due to the preferences of the previous maintainer of this driver we did nearly everything

[Qemu-devel] [PATCH][RFC] Make documentation optional

2006-02-10 Thread Michael Renzmann
Hi. The compilation of the latest qemu CVS version aborted due to a missing texi2html package. In my opinion, the build shouldn't depend on texi2html and pod2man. I suggest to make the documentation optional and warn the user if any of the necessary tools are missing. The attached patch modifies

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH][RFC] Make documentation optional

2006-02-10 Thread Michael Renzmann
Hi again. On Fri, 2006-02-10 at 08:43 +0100, Michael Renzmann wrote: > The attached patch ... ... contained some stuff that should have been ignored by diff. Sorry, revised patch attached to this mail. Bye, Mike diff -urN qemu-cvs/Makefile qemu-cvs-o42/Makefile --- qemu-cvs/Makefile 2006-02

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH][RFC] Make documentation optional

2006-02-10 Thread Michael Renzmann
Hi. On Fri, 2006-02-10 at 09:54 +0100, Bernhard Fischer wrote: > What about just doing this > -install -m 644 qemu-doc.html qemu-tech.html "$(docdir)" That would work, but the user won't be noticed of the fact that parts of the documentation isn't generated. Bye, Mike _

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH][RFC] Make documentation optional

2006-02-10 Thread Michael Renzmann
Hi. On Fri, 2006-02-10 at 10:33 +0100, Bernhard Fischer wrote: > >That would work, but the user won't be noticed of the fact that parts of > >the documentation isn't generated. > Not quite, you'll get > texi2html -monolithic etc failed > make: Error (ignored) > > and the build will move on. Uhm.

[Qemu-devel] [PATCH] distclean target: remove config-host-kqemu.mak

2006-02-10 Thread Michael Renzmann
Hi. The attached trivial patch for current CVS adds config-host-kqemu.mak to the list of removed files in the distclean target. Bye, Mike Index: Makefile === --- Makefile (revision 4) +++ Makefile (working copy) @@ -35,7 +35,7 @@