Wanted to know about individuals that provides support and custom
development for QEUM.
___
Qemu-devel mailing list
Qemu-devel@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel
12/06/2006, a las 20:32, Joe Lee escribió:
Wanted to know about individuals that provides support and custom
development for QEUM.
___
Qemu-devel mailing list
Qemu-devel@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel
I am looking for a good GUI for QEMU. Below are the one I've found about
so far. Does anyone know of any other good GUI
that would be similar to VMware?
http://sourceforge.net/projects/kqemu/
http://emeitner.f2o.org/qemu_launcher
Mike Kronenberg wrote:
On 13.06.2006, at 16:37, Joe Lee
I was wondering if there's the capability to have a "vmware player" type
functionality to qemu. This is just to allow playing or running images
with out needing to create virtual machines. May this could be a
separate product. What's everyones thought to this?
Joe
___
and appreciated your comments/feedback!
joe
Paul Brook wrote:
On Wednesday 14 June 2006 15:55, Joe Lee wrote:
I was wondering if there's the capability to have a "vmware player" type
functionality to qemu. This is just to allow playing or running images
with out needing t
that could quickly run the image (appliance).
Joe
Paul Brook wrote:
On Wednesday 14 June 2006 16:53, Joe Lee wrote:
Why on earth would we want to make a crippled version of qemu?
AFAIK "Creating" a VMware virtual machine is just making a config file.
qemu doesn't have config
Thanks for the comments below, It seems that QEMU can easily be used to
run images. I will start to look into the availabe GUI front-ends for QEMU.
- joe
Jan Marten Simons wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 14. Juni 2006 18:21 schrieb Daniel P. Berrange:
An VMWare player "appliance" is really just a disk
Some of us appriciate the fact that qemu has no "GUI" per se. ;0)
Your right! the keyword is "some" but not all. I think if QEMU is to be
adopted by the masses it will need to come up with a quality
GUI-Frontend. However the CLI can always be in place for those who want
and prefer to use it. O
Good point on that, BUT it's not just about the GUI. It's about an
"easy" way to install the product and run a given app without the need
to create/setup a VM - To me that is the benefit of the VMware player.
However, not much of a big benefit IF QEMU is made easy to install and
has a nice GUI
bad thing. It is what drives the project when others share
there views on features/functionality good or bad!
-joe
Johannes Schindelin wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 15 Jun 2006, Joe Lee wrote:
Some of us appriciate the fact that qemu has no "GUI" per se. ;0)
Your right! the keywo
WaxDragon wrote:
On 6/15/06, Joe Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Good point on that, BUT it's not just about the GUI. It's about an
"easy" way to install the product and run a given app without the need
to create/setup a VM - To me that is the benefit of the VMware play
Johannes Schindelin wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 15 Jun 2006, Joe Lee wrote:
Some of us appriciate the fact that qemu has no "GUI" per se. ;0)
Your right! the keyword is "some" but not all. I think if QEMU is to be
adopted by the masses it will need to come up with a
Johannes Schindelin wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 15 Jun 2006, Joe Lee wrote:
BTW, I am curious to know how much would it cost to develop a good
GUI-Frontend for QEMU that would be comparable to VMware. How much man
hours would this likely take?
I do not know VMware. Anybody? I would be
Johannes Schindelin wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 15 Jun 2006, Joe Lee wrote:
You're right! However, as Julian pointed out: it is less than fascinating to
work on a GUI, _especially_ if it is for the masses who tend to criticize
without contributing*Footnote 1*.
I am not sure I agree if
top, cont, loadvm, startvm, commit, usb
stuff & change device x - that would need to go in the GUI.
Beyond that, what does more bling really bring to the table?
On Thursday 15 June 2006 16:03, Joe Lee wrote:
Johannes Schindelin wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 15 Jun 2006, Joe Lee wrote:
reenshots.php?group_id=168929&ssid=35191
http://sourceforge.net/project/screenshots.php?group_id=168929&ssid=35190
Kevin F. Quinn wrote:
On Thu, 15 Jun 2006 16:17:09 -0500
John Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, 2006-06-15 at 09:18, Joe Lee wrote:
I appreciate the
wayne tempel wrote:
Hey Everybody,
What's up? Wayne here, anyway I found something
interesting that I thought that I would share, it's freeware, it's
called VMX Wizard, for making virtual machines. You can download it at :
rhysgoodwin.orcon.net.nz/vmxwizard/
wayne tempel wrote:
Hey Everybody,
What's up? Wayne here, anyway I found something
interesting that I thought that I would share, it's freeware, it's
called VMX Wizard, for making virtual machines. You can download it at :
rhysgoodwin.orcon.net.nz/vmxwizard/
To me no matter how you pronounce it, It's not a pronounce friendly type
name - IMO.
Joe
Ed Swierk wrote:
On 6/28/06, Paul Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
How should you pronounce Qemu?
FYI, my best guess is Q (as in the letter Q) followed by the first 2
syllables of emulator.
That's ho
I would be interested in a GUI that is not specific to QEMU. e.g. Xen/VT,
Basilisk II, SheepShaver, etc. ;-)
Gwenole, can you elaborate more on your comments above. Are your
comments referring to having a GUI that can both run and manage several
virtualization product (QEMU, XEN, etc) from one
cross-platform is it?
-joe
Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 07:03:31PM -0400, Joe Lee wrote:
I would be interested in a GUI that is not specific to QEMU. e.g. Xen/VT,
Basilisk II, SheepShaver, etc. ;-)
Gwenole, can you elaborate more on your comments above. Are your
Jim C. Brown wrote:
For the record, we can use wxWidgets in qemu even though we can not use C++
in qemu (something that I would be strongly against).
http://wxc.sourceforge.net/
Requiring this as a dependency would make it easier to deal with issues such as
C++ ABI compatibility by avoiding the
Hi All,
I was wondering why the main QEMU site does not have link to download
windows version for QEMU directly from the QEMU.org site. This link only
exist here: http://www.h7.dion.ne.jp/~qemu-win/
Isn't the windows version developed by the same developers? Also, about
the MAC-OS version, w
Anthony Liguori wrote:
On Fri, 21 Jul 2006 14:37:10 -0400, Evan Paul wrote:
The libVirt project is a community-sponsored project that aims to bring
more simplicity and standards to the Linux VM world. At its core,
libVirt is a C toolkit that provides interaction with virtualization
capabiliti
Hi All, I am new to the list. I understand it may be possible for QEUM
to take a VMware image and
convert the VMware file format so that it can run on a XEN/VPS (domu).
I would appreciate if anyone can confirm this for me. Also, any further
comments/suggestions
to the above would be helpful!
Thanks Jim, that's great to hear!
Jim C. Brown wrote:
On Sun, Apr 23, 2006 at 03:08:04PM -0400, Joe Lee wrote:
Hi All, I am new to the list. I understand it may be possible for QEUM
to take a VMware image and
convert the VMware file format so that it can run on a XEN/VPS (domu).
I
26 matches
Mail list logo
