Flush of multi-arch pre-requisite work.
multi-arch queue:
* add EM_MOXIE
* Cleanup ELF_MACHINE and remove from cpu.h
The following changes since commit 9d34158a5af734e8de0b42b0a7228200c426a8d0:
Merge remote-track
From: Peter Crosthwaite
The only generic code relying on this is linux-user, but linux users'
default behaviour of defaulting ELF_MACHINE to ELF_ARCH will handle
this.
The bootloader can just pass EM_OPENRISC directly, as that is
architecture specific code.
This removes another architecture spe
From: Peter Crosthwaite
The bootloader can just pass EM_TRICORE directly, as that
is architecture specific code.
This removes another architecture specific definition from the global
namespace.
Cc: Bastian Koppelmann
Acked-By: Bastian Koppelmann
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson
Acked-By: Riku
From: Peter Crosthwaite
The only generic code relying on this is linux-user, but linux users'
default behaviour of defaulting ELF_MACHINE to ELF_ARCH will handle
this.
The bootloaders can just pass EM_MIPS directly, as that is
architecture specific code.
This removes another architecture specif
From: Peter Crosthwaite
The only generic code relying on this is linux-user, but linux users'
default behaviour of defaulting ELF_MACHINE to ELF_ARCH will handle
this.
This removes another architecture specific definition from the global
namespace.
Cc: Aurelien Jarno
Acked-by: Aurelien Jarno
Paolo,
Are these patches good enough?
Pavel Dovgalyuk
> -Original Message-
> From: Pavel Dovgalyuk [mailto:pavel.dovga...@ispras.ru]
> Sent: Monday, September 07, 2015 11:40 AM
> To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
> Cc: edgar.igles...@xilinx.com; peter.mayd...@linaro.org;
> igor.rubi...@gmail.co
On 11/09/2015 07:52, Pavel Dovgaluk wrote:
> Paolo,
>
> Are these patches good enough?
Haven't reviewed them as I already have a 50 patch queue. I will look
at them next week.
I can already tell you that I'd like some comments in front of clock
warp calls, but that can be added as a follow up
Quick initial high-level feedback, since I'm afraid real review will
take a while (series is long, and I'm still swamped).
Peter Crosthwaite writes:
> Hi Markus and all,
>
> This patch series adds support for automatically concatenating multiple
> errors to the one Error *.
>
> I'll start with w
Hi Rita,
[CC'ing Andrew due to overlap with split irqchip topic]
On 2015-09-09 19:41, Rita Sinha wrote:
> Hi Jan,
>
>>
>> Most likely than not you'll work on the Intel IOMMU and I would
>> suggest, if you wish to get your feet dirty, just start right away
>> with the Intel IOMMU (In which case J
09.09.2015 19:28, John Snow wrote:
> We're a little too lenient with what we'll let an ATAPI drive handle.
> Clamp down on the IDE command execution table to remove CD_OK permissions
> from commands that are not and have never been ATAPI commands.
FWIW, this issue has been assigned CVE-2015-6855 i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2015-09-11 08:50, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Hi Rita,
>
> [CC'ing Andrew due to overlap with split irqchip topic]
>
> On 2015-09-09 19:41, Rita Sinha wrote:
>> Hi Jan,
>>
>>>
>>> Most likely than not you'll work on the Intel IOMMU and I would
>>> sugge
401 - 411 of 411 matches
Mail list logo
