On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 09:00:52PM +0200, Benoît Canet wrote:
> Since the block layer code is starting to modify the BDS graph right in the
> middle of BDS chains (block-mirror's replace parameter for example) QEMU needs
> to properly block and unblock whole BDS subtrees; recursion is a neat way to
>
> Seems like these new functions would be better named '.bdrv_op_block'
> and '.bdrv_op_unblock'? That way, recursive or not, it is clear block
> drivers can implement whatever blocking is appropriate for themselves.
>
> > QLIST_ENTRY(BlockDriver) list;
> > };
Hi,
Thanks a lot for revi
On 09/30/14 06:35, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Sep 2014, Don Slutz wrote:
>> On 09/29/14 06:25, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
>>> On Mon, 29 Sep 2014, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
On Fri, 26 Sep 2014, Don Slutz wrote:
> This adds synchronisation of the vcpu registers
> between Xen
On Tue, 2014-09-30 at 21:38 +0800, Gonglei wrote:
> > Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 2/3] pcie: add check for ari capability
> > of
> > pcie devices
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 06:11:25PM +0800, arei.gong...@huawei.com wrote:
> > > From: Gonglei
> > >
> > > In QEMU, ARI Forwarding is en
John Snow writes:
> On 09/30/2014 03:38 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> John Snow writes:
>>
>>> Instead of duplicating the logic for the if_ide
>>> (bus,unit) mappings, rely on the blockdev layer
>>> for managing those mappings for us, and use the
>>> drive_get_by_index call instead.
>>>
>>> Th
Benoît Canet writes:
> The Tuesday 30 Sep 2014 à 22:08:12 (+0300), Boris Sukholitko wrote :
>> On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 12:46 AM, Benoît Canet
>> wrote:
>> > The Friday 26 Sep 2014 à 18:19:55 (+0300), Boris Sukholitko wrote :
>> >> This patchset is a small rebase of the 9p live migration patches
301 - 306 of 306 matches
Mail list logo
