On 07/27/2011 04:21 PM, Stefan Weil wrote:
NDEBUG is normally set automatically for production code,
and it disables assertions which is not always good.
Assertions are useful even in production code unless
you are sure that the code is bug free or the assertions
cost to much resources - either
On 26 July 2011 15:02, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> In my attempt at PCI modelling, I had something like:
>
> struct I440FX
> {
> Device parent;
>
> PciDevice slots[32];
> };
>
> Which means that to attach to bus 0, slot 3, fn 0, you do:
>
> i440fx->slots[3] = mydevice
So what I don't really unde
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 3:51 PM, Corey Bryant wrote:
> sVirt provides SELinux MAC isolation for Qemu guest processes and their
> corresponding resources (image files). sVirt provides this support
> by labeling guests and resources with security labels that are stored
> in file system extended attr
On Wednesday, July 27, 2011, 22:46:41, Kenneth Salerno wrote:
> c:/devel/target/ea4ef54bcf881bcdd4139385601018a2/lib/glib-2.0/include: No
> such file or directory
This happens if you're not using mingw's pkg-config (which
automatically adjusts prefix) - you'll have to edit your .pc files.
--
<
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 9:42 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> This function should be used when the VM is not supposed to resume
> execution (eg. by issuing 'cont' monitor command).
>
> Today, we allow the user to resume execution even when:
>
> o the guest shuts down and -no-shutdown is used
> o th
On 07/27/2011 04:33 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 26 July 2011 15:02, Anthony Liguori wrote:
In my attempt at PCI modelling, I had something like:
struct I440FX
{
Device parent;
PciDevice slots[32];
};
Which means that to attach to bus 0, slot 3, fn 0, you do:
i440fx->slots[3] = mydevic
OK. i will do it. thanks.
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 10:45 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 3:37 AM, Zhi Yong Wu wrote:
>> For networking and migration areas, is there any new feature to be
>> tested? If yes, can i be their testing volunteer?
>>
>> If QMP has not a voluntter, i
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 8:58 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 11:17 AM, Zhi Yong Wu wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 3:26 AM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 04:59:06PM +0800, Zhi Yong Wu wrote:
Welcome to give me your comments, thanks.
Sign
On Wed, 2011-07-27 at 17:24 +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> making
> sure no lib is calling any I/O function to be able to defreeze the
> filesystems later, making sure the oom killer or a wrong kill -9
> $RANDOM isn't killing the agent by mistake while the I/O is blocked
> and the copy is going.
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 11:49 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 06:17:15PM +0800, Zhi Yong Wu wrote:
>> >> + wait_time = 1;
>> >> + }
>> >> +
>> >> + wait_time = wait_time + (slice_time - elapsed_time);
>> >> + if (wait) {
>> >> + *wait = wait_time * BLOCK
On (Wed) 27 Jul 2011 [15:49:18], Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Amit Shah writes:
>
> > Negative balloon values don't make sense, ignore them.
> >
> > Reported-by: Mike Cao
> > Signed-off-by: Amit Shah
> > ---
> > I'm not sure if error_report is the right thing to use or should a new
> > qerror_rep
Serge - why do you think this can't be SRU'd? It's already been
accepted into lucid-proposed once, then verified, and the only reason
it's not in lucid-updates is that it got superseded by a security upload
before the 7-day testing period had elapsed.
If you made a new upload to lucid-proposed ba
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 8:58 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 11:17 AM, Zhi Yong Wu wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 3:26 AM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 04:59:06PM +0800, Zhi Yong Wu wrote:
Welcome to give me your comments, thanks.
Sign
Hello,
This series is on top of the other balloon series for which I sent a
pull request on Tuesday.
This series fixes memleak on exit, unregisters the savevm section on
unplug, disallows negative values as ballooning targets and doesn't
allow multiple balloon device registrations.
v2 contains s
Multiple balloon registrations are not allowed; check if the
registration with the qemu balloon api succeeded. If not, fail the
device init.
Signed-off-by: Amit Shah
---
hw/virtio-balloon.c |9 -
hw/virtio-pci.c |3 +++
2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff
On (Thu) 28 Jul 2011 [11:47:15], Amit Shah wrote:
> Add an exit handler that will free up RAM and unregister the savevm
> section after a virtio-balloon device is unplugged.
This commit message should be changed; I'll do that in the pull
request I send out.
Amit
Migrating after unplugging a virtio-balloon device resulted in an error
message on the destination:
Unknown savevm section or instance ':00:04.0/virtio-balloon' 0
load of migration failed
Fix this by unregistering the section on device unplug.
Signed-off-by: Amit Shah
---
hw/virtio-balloon
Negative balloon values don't make sense, ignore them.
Reported-by: Mike Cao
Signed-off-by: Amit Shah
---
balloon.c |8 +++-
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/balloon.c b/balloon.c
index 5200565..f56fdc1 100644
--- a/balloon.c
+++ b/balloon.c
@@ -140,6 +140,
Add an exit handler that will free up RAM and unregister the savevm
section after a virtio-balloon device is unplugged.
Signed-off-by: Amit Shah
---
hw/virtio-balloon.c |5 +
hw/virtio-pci.c | 11 ++-
hw/virtio.h |1 +
3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deleti
Multiple balloon devices don't make sense; disallow more than one
registration attempt to register handlers.
Signed-off-by: Amit Shah
---
balloon.c | 12 ++--
balloon.h |4 ++--
2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/balloon.c b/balloon.c
index a938475..520
I see activity around this bug is going on and on, but I don't understand -- is
the talk about this patch --
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/qemu-kvm.git;a=commit;h=7e32b4ca0ea280a2e8f4d9ace1a15d5e633d9a95
?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of qemu
201 - 221 of 221 matches
Mail list logo
