Ryan Harper writes:
> * Markus Armbruster [2010-11-05 11:11]:
>> Ryan Harper writes:
>>
>> > * Markus Armbruster [2010-11-05 08:28]:
>> >> I'd be fine with any of these:
>> >>
>> >> 1. A new command "device_disconnet ID" (or similar name) to disconnect
>> >>device ID from any host parts.
Gleb Natapov writes:
> On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 05:24:01PM +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> Gleb Natapov writes:
>>
>> > On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 03:14:20PM +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> >> Gleb Natapov writes:
>> >>
>> >> > On Thu, Nov 04, 2010 at 03:58:03PM +0100, Markus Armbruster wro
Gleb Natapov writes:
> On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 05:31:38PM +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> Gleb Natapov writes:
>>
>> > On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 03:04:05PM +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> [...]
>> >> >> >> There has been quite some discussion on "canonical path" on the
>> >> >> >> list,
>>
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 7:20 PM, Vince Weaver wrote:
> This is mostly a proof of concept, I'm not sure if anyone is interested in
> this. It could in theory be useful for tracking down performance problems
> from iside of Qemu using existing tools.
This patch handles uniprocessor guests only?
Th
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 7:21 AM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> On 11/04/2010 09:49 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>
>> Got an updated version? :)
>
> I see to have the patchset pushed to kernel.org
> and will send a pointer then.
I'm also interested in seeing the latest and greatest megasas :).
Stefan
On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 10:25:31AM +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Gleb Natapov writes:
>
> > On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 05:31:38PM +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> >> Gleb Natapov writes:
> >>
> >> > On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 03:04:05PM +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> >> [...]
> >> >> >> >> Th
On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 10:01:25AM +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote:
[skip]
> > Why should Seabios match against three (or even more) different type of
> > devices to detect ata interface? Why require Seabios changes when this
> > can be avoided (if new device that provide ata is added)? OpenBIOS als
Gleb Natapov writes:
> On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 10:25:31AM +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> Gleb Natapov writes:
>>
>> > On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 05:31:38PM +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> >> Gleb Natapov writes:
>> >>
>> >> > On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 03:04:05PM +0100, Markus Armbruster wro
Gleb Natapov writes:
> On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 10:01:25AM +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> [skip]
>> > Why should Seabios match against three (or even more) different type of
>> > devices to detect ata interface? Why require Seabios changes when this
>> > can be avoided (if new device that provi
Public bug reported:
The latest version in git (d33ea50a958b2e050d2b28e5f17e3b55e91c6d74)
crashes with an assert error when booting a Sparc/Linux guest.
The last time I tried it (about a week ago) it worked fine. Yesterdai,
I did a git pull, make clean, reran configure and compiled.
Host OS: De
[This is a bug report, reported here since I was redirected to some
corporate site when attempting to follow the recommended bug report
practice. If I am really required to register an account with a
corporation in order to report a qemu bug, and that bug reports are not
accepted here, then please
On Sat, 6 Nov 2010, Torbjorn Granlund wrote:
> [This is a bug report, reported here since I was redirected to some
> corporate site when attempting to follow the recommended bug report
> practice. If I am really required to register an account with a
> corporation in order to report a qemu bug, a
malc writes:
ZF is undefined according to AMD's 24594.pdf page 69.
Ah, you're right. It seems that all existing x86 implementations leave
ZF alone, though. (I am not arguing that qeum is broken, the bug is in
my code.)
I apologize for the false alarm!
--
Torbjörn
On Sat, 6 Nov 2010, Torbjorn Granlund wrote:
> malc writes:
>
> ZF is undefined according to AMD's 24594.pdf page 69.
>
> Ah, you're right. It seems that all existing x86 implementations leave
> ZF alone, though. (I am not arguing that qeum is broken, the bug is in
> my code.)
>
> I apol
On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 07:24:39PM +0100, Torbjorn Granlund wrote:
> malc writes:
>
> ZF is undefined according to AMD's 24594.pdf page 69.
>
> Ah, you're right. It seems that all existing x86 implementations leave
> ZF alone, though. (I am not arguing that qeum is broken, the bug is in
>
On Sat, 6 Nov 2010, Nathan Froyd wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 07:24:39PM +0100, Torbjorn Granlund wrote:
> > malc writes:
> >
> > ZF is undefined according to AMD's 24594.pdf page 69.
> >
> > Ah, you're right. It seems that all existing x86 implementations leave
> > ZF alone, though.
On Sat, 6 Nov 2010, malc wrote:
> On Sat, 6 Nov 2010, Nathan Froyd wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 07:24:39PM +0100, Torbjorn Granlund wrote:
> > > malc writes:
> > >
> > > ZF is undefined according to AMD's 24594.pdf page 69.
> > >
> > > Ah, you're right. It seems that all existing
On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 1:24 PM, Nigel Horne <671...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote:
> Public bug reported:
>
> The latest version in git (d33ea50a958b2e050d2b28e5f17e3b55e91c6d74)
> crashes with an assert error when booting a Sparc/Linux guest.
[...]
> Output:
>
> Adding Swap: 122532k swap-space (priori
Hi folks,
i have one problem
when i use the -cdrom switch on a linux host with win95 guest i become a
yellow question mark in the device section corresponding to second ide
and the cdrom is not listed in My computer
any advice
i am using latest qemu from svn
19 matches
Mail list logo
