From: Igor V. Kovalenko
sparc64 timer has tick counter which can be set and read,
and tick compare value used as deadline to fire timer interrupt.
The timer is not used as periodic timer, instead deadline
is set each time new timer interrupt is needed.
This change implements sparc64 timers witho
On 01/04/2010 10:08 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
Add feature bits as properties to virtio. This makes it possible to e.g. define
machine without indirect buffer support, which is required for 0.10
compatibility, or without hardware checksum support, which is required for 0.11
compatibility. Sin
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 03:31:55AM +0100, andrzej zaborowski wrote:
>/ 2008/12/12 Edgar E. Iglesias :/
>/ > I'm having problems with machine that uses a NAND_MFR_STMICRO 0xf1,/
>/ > recent Linux versions cannot properly read from the flash./
>/ >/
>/ > Turns out that Linux MTD recently learned how
On Thu, Jan 07, 2010 at 03:19:15PM -0500, Jean-Hugues Deschenes wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 03:31:55AM +0100, andrzej zaborowski wrote:
> > >/ 2008/12/12 Edgar E. Iglesias :/
> > >/ > I'm having problems with machine that uses a NAND_MFR_STMICRO 0xf1,/
> > >/ > recent Linux versions cannot p
Hi,
Has anyone used NAND_CMD_COPYBACKPRG1 commands? Those seem
problematic, as it seems s->iolen is not updated when the emulated page
buffer is written to, such that blk_write fails to write the updated
data to the block device... Is it a misunderstanding on my part of the
command sequenc
In this case it was missing on FreeBSD <= 6.x (Which also doesn't have
SNDCTL_DSP_POLICY yet so the version doesn't get used anyway.)
Signed-off-by: Juergen Lock
--- a/audio/ossaudio.c
+++ b/audio/ossaudio.c
@@ -240,7 +240,7 @@ static int oss_open (int in, struct oss_
str
Am 07.01.2010 um 08:31 schrieb Amit Shah:
There's nothing target-dependent in the virtio-serial code so allow it
to be compiled just once for all the targets.
Signed-off-by: Amit Shah
---
Makefile.hw |2 +-
Makefile.target |2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
dif
Hello
Qemu does not build on my platform ( OSX / 10.5 / PowerPC ) because of
the use of LONG_LONG_MAX in raw-posix.c
Replacing LONG_LONG_MAX with LLONG_MAX fixes the build and is more
standard IMHO ( LONG_LONG_MAX is GNU libc, LLONG_MAX is C99 standard )
The following patch makes this trivial swi
Amit Shah wrote:
> Guests send us one buffer at a time. Current guests send buffers sized
> 4K bytes. If guest userspace applications sent out > 4K bytes in one
> write() syscall, the write request actually sends out multiple buffers,
> each of 4K in size.
>
> This usually isn't a problem but for
Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 01/07/2010 09:18 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
> >On 01/07/2010 05:12 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> >>
> >>3) Make qemu request balloon stats regularly (maybe every 10 seconds)
> >>and display the latest stats with info balloon. This avoids the
> >>problem in #2 but it means t
On (Fri) Jan 08 2010 [01:41:48], Andreas Färber wrote:
>
> Am 07.01.2010 um 08:31 schrieb Amit Shah:
>
>> There's nothing target-dependent in the virtio-serial code so allow it
>> to be compiled just once for all the targets.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Amit Shah
>> ---
>> Makefile.hw |2 +-
>> Ma
On (Fri) Jan 08 2010 [01:12:31], Jamie Lokier wrote:
> Amit Shah wrote:
> > Guests send us one buffer at a time. Current guests send buffers sized
> > 4K bytes. If guest userspace applications sent out > 4K bytes in one
> > write() syscall, the write request actually sends out multiple buffers,
> >
On 01/07/2010 08:46 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 01/07/2010 12:28 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Cross compilation works without patches when PATH is modified so it
finds the correct sdl-config
True, but anything beyond "./configure --cross-prefix=cpu-vendor-os-"
(or --host for autoconf) is a bug
On 01/07/2010 09:03 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
This will wreak havoc on the tree since these are built by default and
they are replacing files in revision control.
... the next question is why are they (linuxboot.bin and multiboot.bin)
in revision control since they do not require any strange
Paolo Bonzini a écrit :
> On 01/07/2010 09:03 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>> This will wreak havoc on the tree since these are built by default and
>> they are replacing files in revision control.
>
> ... the next question is why are they (linuxboot.bin and multiboot.bin)
> in revision control sin
101 - 115 of 115 matches
Mail list logo
