Solaris/x86 10 guest installs OK on Linux/x86 host, well done!
The only down side is I'm yet to get networking up.
-Nigel
begin:vcard
fn:Nigel Horne
n:Horne;Nigel
org:NJH Music
adr:Pogmoor;;28 Wharfedale Road;Barnsley;South Yorkshire;S75 2LJ;UK
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
tel;fax:+44 870 70
You should be able to do qemu -hda yourdiskimage.qcow2 -m 512 -net user \
-net nic,model=rtl8139
For solaris 10/x86
On 8/4/07, Nigel Horne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Solaris/x86 10 guest installs OK on Linux/x86 host, well done!
>
> The only down side is I'm yet to get networking up.
>
> -Nig
Jonathan DeKalb's wrote:
You should be able to do qemu -hda yourdiskimage.qcow2 -m 512 -net user \
-net nic,model=rtl8139
Yes indeed that is the sort of thing I've been trying without success.
Jonathan Kalbfeld
+1 323 620 6682
-Nigel
--
Nigel Horne. Arranger, Adjudicator, Band Trainer, Com
CVSROOT:/cvsroot/qemu
Module name:qemu
Changes by: Blue Swirl 07/08/04 10:50:30
Modified files:
. : cpu-exec.c
hw : slavio_intctl.c sun4m.c
target-sparc : cpu.h
Log message:
Fix Sparc32 interrupt handling
CVSWeb URL
I reworked the interrupt handling so that both e2fsck and SMP work.
Previously there may have been lost or spurious interrupts, now they
should be fixed. I pushed the interrupt priority handling from
SLAVIO to CPU.
CVSROOT:/cvsroot/qemu
Module name:qemu
Changes by: Blue Swirl 07/08/04 10:56:26
Modified files:
hw : m48t59.c
Log message:
Use UTC/localtime flag in M48Txx
CVSWeb URLs:
http://cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/qemu/hw/m48t59.c?cvsroot=qemu&r1=1.11&r2=1.
On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 11:02:58AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Bernhard Kauer wrote:
>> -boot_device = 'c'; /* to prevent confusion by the BIOS */
>> +//boot_device = 'c'; /* to prevent confusion by the BIOS */
>> }
>>
>
> Please don't comment out code. Just delete it.
You are
Hello,
Is it planned to submit kqemu to lkml for inclusion into the mainline
kernel?
if not why?
if yes any idea when? is it possible to try to get it in 2.6.24 ?
Hi,
I'm just a user...
Is it planned to submit kqemu to lkml for inclusion into the mainline
> kernel?
Never seen anyone talking about this...
if not why?
Maybe because KVM was included (
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=6aa8b732ca01c3d7a54e93f4d701b
On 8/4/07, Ricardo Almeida <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I'm just a user...
>
> Is it planned to submit kqemu to lkml for inclusion into the mainline
> > kernel?
>
>
> Never seen anyone talking about this...
>
> if not why?
>
>
> Maybe because KVM was included
> (http://git.kernel.org/?p=li
10 matches
Mail list logo
