On Thu, 20 Apr 2006, Dirk Behme wrote:
Thiemo Seufer wrote:
FWIW, I have some rather massive MIPS update (e.g. MIPS32R2 support)
in the works and hope to get it finished enough the next days to
make a quilt patchset of it. I plan to integrate the other MIPS patches
into it for the time bei
Hi Alex,
I've written to the qemu-devel list, no answers.
I copied the list.
You could find my qemu.log there:
http://www.nwpi.ru/~alec/mips/qemu_log.txt
It goes into infinity exception loop. The command string was
I'm not quite sure why but you're getting a RI exception on the
address 0x
Marius Groeger wrote:
> Hi Alex,
>
> >I've written to the qemu-devel list, no answers.
>
> I copied the list.
>
> >You could find my qemu.log there:
> >http://www.nwpi.ru/~alec/mips/qemu_log.txt
> >It goes into infinity exception loop. The command string was
>
> I'm not quite sure why but you'r
"Thiemo Seufer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>You could find my qemu.log there:
>http://www.nwpi.ru/~alec/mips/qemu_log.txt
>It goes into infinity exception loop.
I'm not quite sure why but you're getting a RI exception on the
address 0xbfc8 wich is the "move k0, zero" in the delay slot. I
> Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 21:54:42 +0200
> From: Stefan Weil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: [Qemu-devel] Flash simulation
> To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> A typical embedded system (and also most standard
move k0, zero
j0xbfc00400
nop
Is the move implemented as addiu or as daddiu? The latter would RI.
Oh! It was daddu (gcc -mips3) opcode.
Another issue:
mtc0 zero, C0_CAUSE
===
IN:
0xbfc00424: mtc0 zero,$13
OP:
0x: save_pc 0xbfc00424
0x0001: raise_exception
Solaris 10 does have standards complaint shells. The problem is finding
them. :-7
Check out 'man standards' or this link:
http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/816-5175/6mbba7f3v?a=view
In the utilities section it discusses which shells exist on the system, and
which standards they support.
I found
I recall (vaguely) that some one was able to
compile and run qemu under Solaris-10 on SPARC?
I would like to have the details too.
-ishwar
___
Qemu-devel mailing list
Qemu-devel@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel
Title: usenix 2005 paper
I've just noticed that FB's paper from the 2005 usenix annual technical conference can now be downloaded _without_ usenix membership.
http://www.usenix.org/publications/library/proceedings/usenix05/tech/freenix/full_papers/bellard/bellard.pdf
-Paul
_
Hello everybody,
I have extended the USB support for Qemu. The patch is included and
compiles just fine against todays cvs repository. As explained below,
this patch touches 15 different files, which makes it not so easy to
keep it applying on that very fast developing project. Thats why I would
a
Schwarz, Konrad wrote:
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 21:54:42 +0200
From: Stefan Weil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Flash simulation
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
A typical embedded system (and also most
I am running the current CVS (with the vnc and ide-dma win2k-hack patches
applied), and kqemu 1.3.0-pre5 on a debian-sarge (3.1) release with kernel
2.6.12-1-k7.
I have a (very old) original win2k pro install iso, and after I get service
pack 3 and 4 installed, I've gotten into a situation where
Hi all,
I'm enjoying the new usb tablet device under windows 98. When the
"grabless" mode is enabled, I notice that the numlock keys can get out
of sync. Anyone else seeing this?
For instance, if I have numlock enabled and then start qemu with tablet
support, my win98 thinks numlock is off
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
With this patch applied I could detect a USB Epson Scanner and a USB
Epson Printer from Windows 98 + XP and I could even print pages with
the printer (see known problems below).
reasons for this patch:
I was looking for a way to address my USB printer with windows while
Chris Bagwell wrote:
Hi all,
I'm enjoying the new usb tablet device under windows 98. When the
"grabless" mode is enabled, I notice that the numlock keys can get out
of sync. Anyone else seeing this?
For instance, if I have numlock enabled and then start qemu with
tablet support, my win98
Hello Lonnie,
First, thank you for the answer.
Lonnie Mendez wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> printer was not even detected under qemu. So I started to work on it.
>>
> Are you sure such vast changes are necessary? What was it exactly
> that happened when you attached the printer/scanne
16 matches
Mail list logo
