On 29/03/23 18:22, Laurent Vivier wrote:
Le 28/03/2023 à 14:22, Luca Bonissi a écrit :
On 28/03/23 13:55, Thomas Huth wrote:
On 28/03/2023 13.48, Luca Bonissi wrote:
--- qemu-20230327/linux-user/syscall_defs.h 2023-03-27
15:41:42.0 +0200
+++ qemu-20230327/linux-user/syscall_defs.h.n
Le 28/03/2023 à 14:22, Luca Bonissi a écrit :
On 28/03/23 13:55, Thomas Huth wrote:
On 28/03/2023 13.48, Luca Bonissi wrote:
--- qemu-20230327/linux-user/syscall_defs.h 2023-03-27 15:41:42.0
+0200
+++ qemu-20230327/linux-user/syscall_defs.h.new 2023-03-27
21:43:25.615115126 +020
On 3/28/23 04:48, Luca Bonissi wrote:
On qemu-sparc64 (userspace) the struct "target_stat64" is not correctly padded, so the
field st_rdev is not correctly aligned and will report wrong major/minor (e.g. for
/dev/zero it reports 0,0x1050 instead of 1,5).
Here patch to solve the issue (it a
On 28/03/2023 14.22, Luca Bonissi wrote:
On 28/03/23 13:55, Thomas Huth wrote:
On 28/03/2023 13.48, Luca Bonissi wrote:
--- qemu-20230327/linux-user/syscall_defs.h 2023-03-27
15:41:42.0 +0200
+++ qemu-20230327/linux-user/syscall_defs.h.new 2023-03-27
21:43:25.615115126 +0200
@@
On 28/03/23 13:55, Thomas Huth wrote:
On 28/03/2023 13.48, Luca Bonissi wrote:
--- qemu-20230327/linux-user/syscall_defs.h 2023-03-27
15:41:42.0 +0200
+++ qemu-20230327/linux-user/syscall_defs.h.new 2023-03-27
21:43:25.615115126 +0200
@@ -1450,7 +1450,7 @@ struct target_stat {
On 28/03/2023 13.48, Luca Bonissi wrote:
On qemu-sparc64 (userspace) the struct "target_stat64" is not correctly
padded, so the field st_rdev is not correctly aligned and will report wrong
major/minor (e.g. for /dev/zero it reports 0,0x1050 instead of 1,5).
Here patch to solve the issue (i
On qemu-sparc64 (userspace) the struct "target_stat64" is not correctly
padded, so the field st_rdev is not correctly aligned and will report
wrong major/minor (e.g. for /dev/zero it reports 0,0x1050 instead of
1,5).
Here patch to solve the issue (it also fixes incorrect size on some field
