Hello Paul,
Ummm, I must be representing my ideas somewhat unclear... ;-)
Saturday, October 28, 2006, 3:08:20 AM, you wrote:
[]
>> Thanks for your response. But I hope none of us take the discussion
>> too seriously to consider the arguments like above are all-convincing.
>> They can b
Hello Rob,
Thursday, October 26, 2006, 5:31:46 PM, you wrote:
> On Wednesday 25 October 2006 11:01 am, Paul Brook wrote:
>> > Oh, c'mon, Rob! I really didn't want to ask Paul Brook that, but
>> > sure you'll fix my cluelessness right here, right now - tell me, tell me,
>> > why Linux has dynami
Hello Paul,
Wednesday, October 25, 2006, 6:01:48 PM, you wrote:
>> Oh, c'mon, Rob! I really didn't want to ask Paul Brook that, but
>> sure you'll fix my cluelessness right here, right now - tell me, tell me,
>> why Linux has dynamic-loadable modules support, which clueless passers-by
>> like m
Hello Rob,
Wednesday, October 25, 2006, 2:28:47 AM, you wrote:
> On Monday 23 October 2006 9:38 pm, Paul Sokolovsky wrote:
>> Maybe. But where are new chips in qemu? Why there're still only 2
>> ARM boards? How do I "stick" wi-fi card in one of them? So the concern
>> is not just if it's easy t
Hello Paul,
Tuesday, October 24, 2006, 3:36:40 AM, you wrote:
> On Tuesday 24 October 2006 01:12, Paul Sokolovsky wrote:
>> Hello Paul,
>>
>> Monday, October 23, 2006, 11:29:52 PM, you wrote:
>> > On Monday 23 October 2006 21:01, Rob Landley wrote:
>> >> On Sunday 22 October 2006 2:27 pm, Paul Br
Hello Paul,
Monday, October 23, 2006, 11:29:52 PM, you wrote:
> On Monday 23 October 2006 21:01, Rob Landley wrote:
>> On Sunday 22 October 2006 2:27 pm, Paul Brook wrote:
>> > I've been considering a machine config file for a while, but haven't come
>> > up with a coherent way of representing ev
