John Snow writes:
> On 4/14/20 3:53 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> John Snow writes:
>>
>
>>> Debian:
>>> 8/Jessie: We don't support this anymore AFAIUI.
>>
>> Correct.
>>
>> docs/system/build-platforms.rst:
>>
>> For distributions with long-lifetime releases, the project will aim
>
On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 12:43:01PM -0400, John Snow wrote:
>
>
> On 4/14/20 3:53 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> > John Snow writes:
> >
>
> >> Debian:
> >> 8/Jessie: We don't support this anymore AFAIUI.
> >
> > Correct.
> >
> > docs/system/build-platforms.rst:
> >
> > For distribut
On 4/14/20 3:53 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> John Snow writes:
>
>> Debian:
>> 8/Jessie: We don't support this anymore AFAIUI.
>
> Correct.
>
> docs/system/build-platforms.rst:
>
> For distributions with long-lifetime releases, the project will aim
> to support the most recen
On Tue, 14 Apr 2020 at 11:28, Peter Maydell wrote:
> PS: why 1.6.1 and not 1.6.0? You don't list 1.6.0 in your set of
> things you tested, was it just that you couldn't find it?
Aha, I have just discovered that the Sphinx changelog
explains that 1.6.0 was "not released (because of package
scrip
On Mon, 13 Apr 2020 at 19:08, John Snow wrote:
> 1.5 - 1.5.6: Fails to build.
>
> Warning, treated as error:
> /home/jsnow/src/qemu/docs/system/invocation.rst:544: WARNING: Malformed
> option description '[enable=]PATTERN', should look like "opt", "-opt
> args", "--opt args", "/opt args" or "+opt
John Snow writes:
> On 4/13/20 2:22 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> On Mon, 13 Apr 2020 at 19:08, John Snow wrote:
>>> I was curious about our actual version compatibility, so I did some testing.
>>
>> Thanks for doing the testing.
>>
>>> 1.6.1 through 2.2.2 all appear to work just fine, but produ
On 4/13/20 2:22 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Apr 2020 at 19:08, John Snow wrote:
>> I was curious about our actual version compatibility, so I did some testing.
>
> Thanks for doing the testing.
>
>> 1.6.1 through 2.2.2 all appear to work just fine, but produce a lot of
>> warnings a
On Mon, 13 Apr 2020 at 19:08, John Snow wrote:
> I was curious about our actual version compatibility, so I did some testing.
Thanks for doing the testing.
> 1.6.1 through 2.2.2 all appear to work just fine, but produce a lot of
> warnings about a coming incompatibility with Docutils > 0.16.
FW
