On Fri, Feb 25, 2022 at 11:58:43AM +0800, wli...@stu.xidian.edu.cn wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Here is a new patch with Signed-off-by tags.
> The old one is wrong for it did't have Signed-off-by tags.
> I am looking forward to your confirmation.
>
> Thanks,
> Wentao
> From 8ece42bda1099a9a0df584cac2478
Hi all,
Here is a new patch with Signed-off-by tags.
The old one is wrong for it did't have Signed-off-by tags.
I am looking forward to your confirmation.
Thanks,
Wentao
From 8ece42bda1099a9a0df584cac2478ec5a6e83924 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Wentao_Liang
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2022 11:49:54 +080
> > thanks for your report and patch - but to make sure that the right
> > people get attention, please use the scripts/get_maintainer.pl script to
> > get a list of people who should be on CC:, or look into the MAINTAINERS
> > file directly (for the next time - this time, I've CC:ed them now a
Hi,
On 2/23/22 5:02 PM, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 23/02/2022 15.36, wli...@stu.xidian.edu.cn wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I find a potential Use-after-free in QEMU 6.2.0, which is in
>> virtio_iommu_handle_command() (./hw/virtio/virtio-iommu.c).
>>
>> Specifically, in the loop body, the variable 'buf' al
On 23/2/22 17:02, Thomas Huth wrote:
On 23/02/2022 15.36, wli...@stu.xidian.edu.cn wrote:
Hi all,
I find a potential Use-after-free in QEMU 6.2.0, which is in
virtio_iommu_handle_command() (./hw/virtio/virtio-iommu.c).
I'm looking forward to your confirmation.
Hi,
thanks for your repor
On 23/02/2022 15.36, wli...@stu.xidian.edu.cn wrote:
Hi all,
I find a potential Use-after-free in QEMU 6.2.0, which is in
virtio_iommu_handle_command() (./hw/virtio/virtio-iommu.c).
Specifically, in the loop body, the variable 'buf' allocated at line 639 can
be freed by g_free() at line 659.
