> On Jan 30, 2025, at 2:16, Jonathan Cameron
> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 29 Jan 2025 10:14:34 +0900
> Itaru Kitayama wrote:
>
>>> On Jan 22, 2025, at 23:07, Jonathan Cameron
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Fri, 17 Jan 2025 09:43:11 +
>>> Jonathan Cameron via wrote:
>>>
On Fri, 17 Jan 2025 10:1
On Wed, 29 Jan 2025 10:14:34 +0900
Itaru Kitayama wrote:
> > On Jan 22, 2025, at 23:07, Jonathan Cameron
> > wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 17 Jan 2025 09:43:11 +
> > Jonathan Cameron via wrote:
> >
> >> On Fri, 17 Jan 2025 10:13:41 +0900
> >> Itaru Kitayama wrote:
> >>
> On Jan 16, 2
> On Jan 22, 2025, at 23:07, Jonathan Cameron
> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 17 Jan 2025 09:43:11 +
> Jonathan Cameron via wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 17 Jan 2025 10:13:41 +0900
>> Itaru Kitayama wrote:
>>
On Jan 16, 2025, at 19:58, Jonathan Cameron
wrote:
On Thu, 16 Jan 2025 15:
On Fri, 17 Jan 2025 09:43:11 +
Jonathan Cameron via wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Jan 2025 10:13:41 +0900
> Itaru Kitayama wrote:
>
> > > On Jan 16, 2025, at 19:58, Jonathan Cameron
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, 16 Jan 2025 15:04:53 +0900
> > > Itaru Kitayama wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hi Jonath
On Fri, 17 Jan 2025 10:13:41 +0900
Itaru Kitayama wrote:
> > On Jan 16, 2025, at 19:58, Jonathan Cameron
> > wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 16 Jan 2025 15:04:53 +0900
> > Itaru Kitayama wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Jonathan,
> >>
> >>> On Jan 14, 2025, at 19:26, Jonathan Cameron
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >
On Fri, 17 Jan 2025 09:24:15 +0900
Itaru Kitayama wrote:
> > On Jan 16, 2025, at 19:58, Jonathan Cameron
> > wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 16 Jan 2025 15:04:53 +0900
> > Itaru Kitayama wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Jonathan,
> >>
> >>> On Jan 14, 2025, at 19:26, Jonathan Cameron
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >
> On Jan 16, 2025, at 19:58, Jonathan Cameron
> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 16 Jan 2025 15:04:53 +0900
> Itaru Kitayama wrote:
>
>> Hi Jonathan,
>>
>>> On Jan 14, 2025, at 19:26, Jonathan Cameron
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, 14 Jan 2025 12:03:03 +0900
>>> Itaru Kitayama wrote:
>>>
Hi Jonath
> On Jan 16, 2025, at 19:58, Jonathan Cameron
> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 16 Jan 2025 15:04:53 +0900
> Itaru Kitayama wrote:
>
>> Hi Jonathan,
>>
>>> On Jan 14, 2025, at 19:26, Jonathan Cameron
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, 14 Jan 2025 12:03:03 +0900
>>> Itaru Kitayama wrote:
>>>
Hi Jonath
On Thu, 16 Jan 2025 15:04:53 +0900
Itaru Kitayama wrote:
> Hi Jonathan,
>
> > On Jan 14, 2025, at 19:26, Jonathan Cameron
> > wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 14 Jan 2025 12:03:03 +0900
> > Itaru Kitayama wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Jonathan,
> >>
> >>> On Jan 10, 2025, at 21:31, Jonathan Cameron
> >>
Hi Jonathan,
> On Jan 14, 2025, at 19:26, Jonathan Cameron
> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 14 Jan 2025 12:03:03 +0900
> Itaru Kitayama wrote:
>
>> Hi Jonathan,
>>
>>> On Jan 10, 2025, at 21:31, Jonathan Cameron
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Fri, 10 Jan 2025 09:20:54 +
>>> "Zhijian Li (Fujitsu)" via wr
On Tue, 14 Jan 2025 12:03:03 +0900
Itaru Kitayama wrote:
> Hi Jonathan,
>
> > On Jan 10, 2025, at 21:31, Jonathan Cameron
> > wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 10 Jan 2025 09:20:54 +
> > "Zhijian Li (Fujitsu)" via wrote:
> >
> >> On 10/01/2025 13:29, Itaru Kitayama wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>> Is a
Hi Jonathan,
> On Jan 10, 2025, at 21:31, Jonathan Cameron
> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 10 Jan 2025 09:20:54 +
> "Zhijian Li (Fujitsu)" via wrote:
>
>> On 10/01/2025 13:29, Itaru Kitayama wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> Is anybody working on the CXL emulation on aarch64?
>>
>> I'm not currently working on
On Fri, 10 Jan 2025 09:20:54 +
"Zhijian Li (Fujitsu)" via wrote:
> On 10/01/2025 13:29, Itaru Kitayama wrote:
> > Hi,
> > Is anybody working on the CXL emulation on aarch64?
>
> I'm not currently working on the CXL emulation on aarch64.
>
> However, IIRC the CXL maintainer's tree should w
On 10/01/2025 13:29, Itaru Kitayama wrote:
> Hi,
> Is anybody working on the CXL emulation on aarch64?
I'm not currently working on the CXL emulation on aarch64.
However, IIRC the CXL maintainer's tree should work.
https://gitlab.com/jic23/qemu/
Thanks
Zhijian
> If there’s a WIP branch, a po
14 matches
Mail list logo