Re: [RFC PATCH QEMU 0/3] cxl/plugins: Hotness Monitoring Unit with 'real' data.

On Thu, 30 Jan 2025 10:28:03 -0800 Pierrick Bouvier wrote: > On 1/30/25 07:52, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > > On Wed, 29 Jan 2025 14:31:10 -0800 > > Pierrick Bouvier wrote: > > > >> Hi Jonathan, > >> > >> On 1/29/25 02:29, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > >>> On Tue, 28 Jan 2025 12:04:19 -0800 > >>>

Re: [RFC PATCH QEMU 0/3] cxl/plugins: Hotness Monitoring Unit with 'real' data.

On 1/30/25 07:52, Jonathan Cameron wrote: On Wed, 29 Jan 2025 14:31:10 -0800 Pierrick Bouvier wrote: Hi Jonathan, On 1/29/25 02:29, Jonathan Cameron wrote: On Tue, 28 Jan 2025 12:04:19 -0800 Pierrick Bouvier wrote: On 1/27/25 02:20, Jonathan Cameron wrote: On Fri, 24 Jan 2025 12:55:52

Re: [RFC PATCH QEMU 0/3] cxl/plugins: Hotness Monitoring Unit with 'real' data.

On Wed, 29 Jan 2025 14:31:10 -0800 Pierrick Bouvier wrote: > Hi Jonathan, > > On 1/29/25 02:29, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > > On Tue, 28 Jan 2025 12:04:19 -0800 > > Pierrick Bouvier wrote: > > > >> On 1/27/25 02:20, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > >>> On Fri, 24 Jan 2025 12:55:52 -0800 > >>> Pierr

Re: [RFC PATCH QEMU 0/3] cxl/plugins: Hotness Monitoring Unit with 'real' data.

Hi Jonathan, On 1/29/25 02:29, Jonathan Cameron wrote: On Tue, 28 Jan 2025 12:04:19 -0800 Pierrick Bouvier wrote: On 1/27/25 02:20, Jonathan Cameron wrote: On Fri, 24 Jan 2025 12:55:52 -0800 Pierrick Bouvier wrote: Hi Jonathan, thanks for posting this. It's a creative usage of plugins

Re: [RFC PATCH QEMU 0/3] cxl/plugins: Hotness Monitoring Unit with 'real' data.

On Tue, 28 Jan 2025 12:04:19 -0800 Pierrick Bouvier wrote: > On 1/27/25 02:20, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > > On Fri, 24 Jan 2025 12:55:52 -0800 > > Pierrick Bouvier wrote: > > > >> Hi Jonathan, > >> > >> thanks for posting this. It's a creative usage of plugins. > >> > >> I think that your curr

Re: [RFC PATCH QEMU 0/3] cxl/plugins: Hotness Monitoring Unit with 'real' data.

On 1/27/25 02:20, Jonathan Cameron wrote: On Fri, 24 Jan 2025 12:55:52 -0800 Pierrick Bouvier wrote: Hi Jonathan, thanks for posting this. It's a creative usage of plugins. I think that your current approach, decoupling plugins, CHMU and device model is a good thing. I'm not familiar with C

Re: [RFC PATCH QEMU 0/3] cxl/plugins: Hotness Monitoring Unit with 'real' data.

On Fri, 24 Jan 2025 12:55:52 -0800 Pierrick Bouvier wrote: > Hi Jonathan, > > thanks for posting this. It's a creative usage of plugins. > > I think that your current approach, decoupling plugins, CHMU and device > model is a good thing. > > I'm not familiar with CXL, but one question that co

Re: [RFC PATCH QEMU 0/3] cxl/plugins: Hotness Monitoring Unit with 'real' data.

Hi Jonathan, thanks for posting this. It's a creative usage of plugins. I think that your current approach, decoupling plugins, CHMU and device model is a good thing. I'm not familiar with CXL, but one question that comes to my mind is: Is that mandatory to do this analysis during execution (