Re: [RFC PATCH-for-10.1 28/39] exec: Do not poison hardware accelerators

2025-04-04 Thread Pierrick Bouvier
On 4/4/25 15:00, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: +Paolo On 4/4/25 20:25, Pierrick Bouvier wrote: On 4/3/25 16:58, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: Hardware accelerators depends on the host, not the guest. While this is true, no we can't unpoison those define. They are applied per target, and not

Re: [RFC PATCH-for-10.1 28/39] exec: Do not poison hardware accelerators

2025-04-04 Thread Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
+Paolo On 4/4/25 20:25, Pierrick Bouvier wrote: On 4/3/25 16:58, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: Hardware accelerators depends on the host, not the guest. While this is true, no we can't unpoison those define. They are applied per target, and not in config-host. So unpoisoining them opens the

Re: [RFC PATCH-for-10.1 28/39] exec: Do not poison hardware accelerators

2025-04-04 Thread Pierrick Bouvier
On 4/3/25 16:58, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: Hardware accelerators depends on the host, not the guest. While this is true, no we can't unpoison those define. They are applied per target, and not in config-host. So unpoisoining them opens the possibility to miss something. I would stick to