Re: [RFC PATCH] target/arm: allow gdb to read ARM_CP_NORAW regs

On Thu, 8 May 2025 at 14:37, Alex Bennée wrote: > > Peter Maydell writes: > > > On Thu, 8 May 2025 at 12:50, Alex Bennée wrote: > >> > >> Peter Maydell writes: > >> > >> > On Wed, 7 May 2025 at 17:58, Alex Bennée wrote: > >> >> > >> >> Before this we suppress all ARM_CP_NORAW registers being l

Re: [RFC PATCH] target/arm: allow gdb to read ARM_CP_NORAW regs

Peter Maydell writes: > On Thu, 8 May 2025 at 12:50, Alex Bennée wrote: >> >> Peter Maydell writes: >> >> > On Wed, 7 May 2025 at 17:58, Alex Bennée wrote: >> >> >> >> Before this we suppress all ARM_CP_NORAW registers being listed under >> >> GDB. This includes useful registers like CurrentEL

Re: [RFC PATCH] target/arm: allow gdb to read ARM_CP_NORAW regs

On Thu, 8 May 2025 at 12:50, Alex Bennée wrote: > > Peter Maydell writes: > > > On Wed, 7 May 2025 at 17:58, Alex Bennée wrote: > >> > >> Before this we suppress all ARM_CP_NORAW registers being listed under > >> GDB. This includes useful registers like CurrentEL which gets tagged > >> as ARM_CP

Re: [RFC PATCH] target/arm: allow gdb to read ARM_CP_NORAW regs

Peter Maydell writes: > On Wed, 7 May 2025 at 17:58, Alex Bennée wrote: >> >> Before this we suppress all ARM_CP_NORAW registers being listed under >> GDB. This includes useful registers like CurrentEL which gets tagged >> as ARM_CP_NO_RAW because it is one of the ARM_CP_SPECIAL_MASK >> register

Re: [RFC PATCH] target/arm: allow gdb to read ARM_CP_NORAW regs

On Wed, 7 May 2025 at 17:58, Alex Bennée wrote: > > Before this we suppress all ARM_CP_NORAW registers being listed under > GDB. This includes useful registers like CurrentEL which gets tagged > as ARM_CP_NO_RAW because it is one of the ARM_CP_SPECIAL_MASK > registers. These are registers TCG can