Re: [RFC PATCH] docs/interop: define STANDALONE protocol feature for vhost-user

2023-07-26 Thread Stefan Hajnoczi
On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 12:02:33PM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 02:08:39PM -0400, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 06:22:08PM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 05:31:03PM -0400, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > > > > On Thu, 20 Ju

Re: [RFC PATCH] docs/interop: define STANDALONE protocol feature for vhost-user

2023-07-26 Thread Michael S. Tsirkin
On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 02:08:39PM -0400, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 06:22:08PM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 05:31:03PM -0400, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > > > On Thu, 20 Jul 2023 at 17:15, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 20,

Re: [RFC PATCH] docs/interop: define STANDALONE protocol feature for vhost-user

2023-07-24 Thread Stefan Hajnoczi
On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 06:22:08PM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 05:31:03PM -0400, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > > On Thu, 20 Jul 2023 at 17:15, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 03:58:37PM -0400, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jul 06, 20

Re: [RFC PATCH] docs/interop: define STANDALONE protocol feature for vhost-user

2023-07-20 Thread Michael S. Tsirkin
On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 05:31:03PM -0400, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > On Thu, 20 Jul 2023 at 17:15, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 03:58:37PM -0400, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > > > On Thu, Jul 06, 2023 at 12:48:20PM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jul 04, 2023

Re: [RFC PATCH] docs/interop: define STANDALONE protocol feature for vhost-user

2023-07-20 Thread Stefan Hajnoczi
On Thu, 20 Jul 2023 at 17:15, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 03:58:37PM -0400, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 06, 2023 at 12:48:20PM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > On Tue, Jul 04, 2023 at 01:36:00PM +0100, Alex Bennée wrote: > > > > Currently QEMU has to know

Re: [RFC PATCH] docs/interop: define STANDALONE protocol feature for vhost-user

2023-07-20 Thread Michael S. Tsirkin
On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 03:58:37PM -0400, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > On Thu, Jul 06, 2023 at 12:48:20PM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 04, 2023 at 01:36:00PM +0100, Alex Bennée wrote: > > > Currently QEMU has to know some details about the back-end to be able > > > to setup the gues

Re: [RFC PATCH] docs/interop: define STANDALONE protocol feature for vhost-user

2023-07-20 Thread Stefan Hajnoczi
On Thu, Jul 06, 2023 at 12:48:20PM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Tue, Jul 04, 2023 at 01:36:00PM +0100, Alex Bennée wrote: > > Currently QEMU has to know some details about the back-end to be able > > to setup the guest. While various parts of the setup can be delegated > > to the backend (

Re: [RFC PATCH] docs/interop: define STANDALONE protocol feature for vhost-user

2023-07-20 Thread Stefan Hajnoczi
On Tue, Jul 04, 2023 at 01:36:00PM +0100, Alex Bennée wrote: > diff --git a/hw/virtio/vhost-user.c b/hw/virtio/vhost-user.c > index c4e0cbd702..28b021d5d3 100644 > --- a/hw/virtio/vhost-user.c > +++ b/hw/virtio/vhost-user.c > @@ -202,6 +202,13 @@ typedef struct VhostUserInflight { > uint16_t q

Re: [RFC PATCH] docs/interop: define STANDALONE protocol feature for vhost-user

2023-07-20 Thread Stefan Hajnoczi
On Tue, Jul 04, 2023 at 01:36:00PM +0100, Alex Bennée wrote: > Currently QEMU has to know some details about the back-end to be able > to setup the guest. While various parts of the setup can be delegated > to the backend (for example config handling) this is a very piecemeal > approach. > > This

Re: [RFC PATCH] docs/interop: define STANDALONE protocol feature for vhost-user

2023-07-07 Thread Alex Bennée
"Michael S. Tsirkin" writes: > On Fri, Jul 07, 2023 at 08:58:00AM +0100, Alex Bennée wrote: >> >> "Michael S. Tsirkin" writes: >> >> > On Tue, Jul 04, 2023 at 01:36:00PM +0100, Alex Bennée wrote: >> >> Currently QEMU has to know some details about the back-end to be able >> >> to setup the g

Re: [RFC PATCH] docs/interop: define STANDALONE protocol feature for vhost-user

2023-07-07 Thread Stefano Garzarella
On Thu, Jul 06, 2023 at 05:31:15PM +0100, Alex Bennée wrote: Alex Bennée writes: Currently QEMU has to know some details about the back-end to be able to setup the guest. While various parts of the setup can be delegated to the backend (for example config handling) this is a very piecemeal ap

Re: [RFC PATCH] docs/interop: define STANDALONE protocol feature for vhost-user

2023-07-07 Thread Michael S. Tsirkin
On Fri, Jul 07, 2023 at 08:58:00AM +0100, Alex Bennée wrote: > > "Michael S. Tsirkin" writes: > > > On Tue, Jul 04, 2023 at 01:36:00PM +0100, Alex Bennée wrote: > >> Currently QEMU has to know some details about the back-end to be able > >> to setup the guest. While various parts of the setup ca

Re: [RFC PATCH] docs/interop: define STANDALONE protocol feature for vhost-user

2023-07-07 Thread Alex Bennée
"Michael S. Tsirkin" writes: > On Tue, Jul 04, 2023 at 01:36:00PM +0100, Alex Bennée wrote: >> Currently QEMU has to know some details about the back-end to be able >> to setup the guest. While various parts of the setup can be delegated >> to the backend (for example config handling) this is a

Re: [RFC PATCH] docs/interop: define STANDALONE protocol feature for vhost-user

2023-07-06 Thread Michael S. Tsirkin
On Tue, Jul 04, 2023 at 01:36:00PM +0100, Alex Bennée wrote: > Currently QEMU has to know some details about the back-end to be able > to setup the guest. While various parts of the setup can be delegated > to the backend (for example config handling) this is a very piecemeal > approach. > This pa

Re: [RFC PATCH] docs/interop: define STANDALONE protocol feature for vhost-user

2023-07-06 Thread Alex Bennée
Alex Bennée writes: > Currently QEMU has to know some details about the back-end to be able > to setup the guest. While various parts of the setup can be delegated > to the backend (for example config handling) this is a very piecemeal > approach. > > This patch suggests a new feature flag (VHO