Am 09.09.2013 um 10:47 hat xuanmao_001 geschrieben:
> > I sent patches that should eliminate the difference between the first
> > and second snapshot at least.
>
> where I can find the patches that can
> eliminate the difference between the first
> and second snapshot ? Does they fit qemu-kvm-1.0
> I sent patches that should eliminate the difference between the first
> and second snapshot at least.
where I can find the patches that can eliminate the difference between the first
and second snapshot ? Does they fit qemu-kvm-1.0,1 ?
xuanmao_001
From: Kevin Wolf
Date: 2013-09-09 16:35
To:
Am 09.09.2013 um 03:57 hat xuanmao_001 geschrieben:
> >> the other question: when I change the buffer size #define IO_BUF_SIZE 32768
> >> to #define IO_BUF_SIZE (1 * 1024 * 1024), the savevm is more quickly.
>
> > Is this for cache=unsafe as well?
>
> > Juan, any specific reason for using 32k?
>> the other question: when I change the buffer size #define IO_BUF_SIZE 32768
>> to #define IO_BUF_SIZE (1 * 1024 * 1024), the savevm is more quickly.
> Is this for cache=unsafe as well?
> Juan, any specific reason for using 32k? I think it would be better to
> have a multiple of the qcow2 clust
Am 06.09.2013 um 03:31 hat xuanmao_001 geschrieben:
> Hi, qemuers:
>
> I found that the guest disk file cache mode will affect to the time of savevm.
>
> the cache 'writeback' too slow. but the cache 'unsafe' is as fast as it can,
> less than 10 seconds.
>
> here is the example I use virsh:
>
