On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 03:05:25PM +0100, Ulrich Hecht wrote:
> gcc 3.3 (Hammer branch, really vintage stuff) with recent (2.18.50)
> binutils.
Okay, ancient compiler with the other binutils branch. I did not use
them since years.
> I am actually suspecting this to be a compiler bug, but I did n
On Tuesday 13 November 2007, Bastian Blank wrote:
> Please describe the environment you work in, including compiler
> versions and patchsets.
gcc 3.3 (Hammer branch, really vintage stuff) with recent (2.18.50)
binutils. We already use gcc 4 for targets where the old one won't work
(ia64 and ppc6
On Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 06:14:43PM +0100, Ulrich Hecht wrote:
> On Saturday 10 November 2007, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > Thimo Seufer asked me to check if the s390 host supports works at all.
> > It did not even build, dyngen failed.
> A 31-bit build of the CVS code works fine for me.
Please describ
On Saturday 10 November 2007, Bastian Blank wrote:
> Thimo Seufer asked me to check if the s390 host supports works at all.
> It did not even build, dyngen failed.
A 31-bit build of the CVS code works fine for me. (At least if I add the
br %rANY fix that is also in your patch and the jcc patch th
