On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 10:39:39AM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2012-12-10 10:36, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 08:37:22AM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >> On 2012-12-06 08:59, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >>> I've been looking at handling of msix masking
> >>> in qemu. It look
On 2012-12-10 10:36, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 08:37:22AM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> On 2012-12-06 08:59, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>> I've been looking at handling of msix masking
>>> in qemu. It looks like all of virtio,vfio and
>>> device assignment implemented their
On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 08:37:22AM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2012-12-06 08:59, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > I've been looking at handling of msix masking
> > in qemu. It looks like all of virtio,vfio and
> > device assignment implemented their own
> > similar but slightly different thing.
> >
On 2012-12-06 08:59, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> I've been looking at handling of msix masking
> in qemu. It looks like all of virtio,vfio and
> device assignment implemented their own
> similar but slightly different thing.
> So I am inclined to move this handling to common
> code in msix.c, addin
