Thanks for the answer. For right now, I am OK with this, since I realized
that cache access is uniform (cache sets are calculated by modulo) and my
work concerns with cache. Still, I am happy to know that it is expected
thing and not unexpected.
Also I have one very important question and I would
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 21:49, sparsh mittal wrote:
> GBrange numberOfAddresses
>
> 0-0.5---> 3325
>
> 0.5-1---> 1253
>
> 1-1.5---> 0
>
> 1.5-2---> 30
>
> 2-2.5---> 0
>
> 2.5-3---> 1708
>
> 3-3.5---> 10521
>
> 3.5-4---> 0
>
> 4-4.5--> 15428
Hi...
I never observe the above address usage like you