Hello guys,
I have sent the patch, please check here:
http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2014-04/msg00018.html
On 03/27/2014 04:38 PM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
"qiaonuo...@cn.fujitsu.com" writes:
On 03/27/2014 01:04 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
So something like adding
dum
"qiaonuo...@cn.fujitsu.com" writes:
> On 03/27/2014 01:04 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> So something like adding
>>
>> dump_guest_memory_set_format
>>
>> would be the only possible solution with the hmp code as
>> is. Correct?
> >>>
> >
On 03/27/2014 01:04 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> So something like adding
>
> dump_guest_memory_set_format
>
> would be the only possible solution with the hmp code as is.
> Correct?
>>>
>>> Yes, one possibility would be to make the d
"qiaonuo...@cn.fujitsu.com" writes:
> On 03/21/2014 05:12 AM, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> > Two additional points:
> >
> > On 03/20/14 21:56, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> >> On 03/20/14 21:38, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> >>> Qiao Nuohan,
> >>>
> >>> is there a reason why you did not implemented the
On 03/21/2014 05:12 AM, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> Two additional points:
>
> On 03/20/14 21:56, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>> On 03/20/14 21:38, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>>> Qiao Nuohan,
>>>
>>> is there a reason why you did not implemented the HMP part for that format
>>> of kdump compressed form
On 21/03/14 10:31, qiaonuo...@cn.fujitsu.com wrote:
[]
>>> Another option would be to leave the current command intact, and add an
>>> independent command that wouldn't take "begin", "end", nor "paging", but
>>> would take compression format.
>>
>> Another possibility is to kill begin/length f
On 03/20/14 22:18, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> On 20/03/14 21:56, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>> On 03/20/14 21:38, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>>> Qiao Nuohan,
>>>
>>> is there a reason why you did not implemented the HMP part for that format
>>> of kdump compressed format? After all this is a patch m
Il 20/03/2014 22:28, Laszlo Ersek ha scritto:
On 03/20/14 22:18, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
On 20/03/14 21:56, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
On 03/20/14 21:38, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
Qiao Nuohan,
is there a reason why you did not implemented the HMP part for that format
of kdump compressed form
On 20/03/14 21:56, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> On 03/20/14 21:38, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>> Qiao Nuohan,
>>
>> is there a reason why you did not implemented the HMP part for that format
>> of kdump compressed format? After all this is a patch mostly for developers,
>> so a HMP interface might come
Two additional points:
On 03/20/14 21:56, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> On 03/20/14 21:38, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>> Qiao Nuohan,
>>
>> is there a reason why you did not implemented the HMP part for that format
>> of kdump compressed format? After all this is a patch mostly for developers,
>> so a H
On 03/20/14 21:38, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> Qiao Nuohan,
>
> is there a reason why you did not implemented the HMP part for that format
> of kdump compressed format? After all this is a patch mostly for developers,
> so a HMP interface might come handy. Do you already have some patch in
> p
11 matches
Mail list logo
