On 4 August 2014 12:12, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> I'm afraid we need rip out the problematic patches. Here's Paolo's
> list:
>
> Fabrice Bellard
> 1d6bda356153c82e100680d9f2165e32c8fb1330
> 750afe93fd15fafc20b6c34d30f339547d15c2d1
>
> Jocelyn Mayer
> 75d62a585629cdc1ae0d
Alexey Kardashevskiy writes:
> On 08/04/2014 06:48 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> On 4 August 2014 05:55, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>>> Our lawyers refused to provide any public advise on this :-/
>>>
>>> Is that it, end of story? :)
>>
>> Well, I 'd still like to get the license fixed to at lea
On 08/04/2014 06:48 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 4 August 2014 05:55, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>> Our lawyers refused to provide any public advise on this :-/
>>
>> Is that it, end of story? :)
>
> Well, I 'd still like to get the license fixed to at least my
> personal satisfaction, but if y
On 4 August 2014 05:55, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> Our lawyers refused to provide any public advise on this :-/
>
> Is that it, end of story? :)
Well, I 'd still like to get the license fixed to at least my
personal satisfaction, but if your lawyers won't confirm
whether what we propose will w
On 06/03/2014 09:42 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 3 June 2014 12:38, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>> On 06/03/2014 07:45 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
>>> On 3 June 2014 04:52, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
Is there anything I can do to help with this? Chase someone down? :)
>>>
>>> Confirming that
On 3 June 2014 12:38, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> On 06/03/2014 07:45 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> On 3 June 2014 04:52, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>>> Is there anything I can do to help with this? Chase someone down? :)
>>
>> Confirming that your lawyers are happy with the approach
>> Anthony
On 06/03/2014 07:45 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 3 June 2014 04:52, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>> Is there anything I can do to help with this? Chase someone down? :)
>
> Confirming that your lawyers are happy with the approach
> Anthony proposed to take to fixing this would probably
> be usefu
On 3 June 2014 04:52, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> Is there anything I can do to help with this? Chase someone down? :)
Confirming that your lawyers are happy with the approach
Anthony proposed to take to fixing this would probably
be useful :-)
-- PMM
On 05/21/2014 07:25 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
> On 21.05.14 11:17, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> On 21 May 2014 08:51, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>> Il 21/05/2014 05:54, Alexey Kardashevskiy ha scritto:
>>>
Hi!
We recently discovered that not entire QEMU is GPL2-compatible, the fpu
emu
Am 21.05.2014 11:47, schrieb Peter Maydell:
> On 21 May 2014 10:43, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> Alexander Graf writes:
>>> How many % of the overall commits does that make? IIRC you can
>>> relicense source code if the "majority of authors" agrees and nobody
>>> actively disagrees - or so. But IA
On 21 May 2014 10:43, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Alexander Graf writes:
>> How many % of the overall commits does that make? IIRC you can
>> relicense source code if the "majority of authors" agrees and nobody
>> actively disagrees - or so. But IANAL :)
>
> You can get away with infringing copyri
Alexander Graf writes:
> On 21.05.14 09:51, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> Il 21/05/2014 05:54, Alexey Kardashevskiy ha scritto:
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>> We recently discovered that not entire QEMU is GPL2-compatible, the fpu
>>> emulation has a different license (copied below) which might create
>>> legal
>>> p
On 21.05.14 11:17, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 21 May 2014 08:51, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 21/05/2014 05:54, Alexey Kardashevskiy ha scritto:
Hi!
We recently discovered that not entire QEMU is GPL2-compatible, the fpu
emulation has a different license (copied below) which might create legal
prob
On 21 May 2014 08:51, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 21/05/2014 05:54, Alexey Kardashevskiy ha scritto:
>
>> Hi!
>>
>> We recently discovered that not entire QEMU is GPL2-compatible, the fpu
>> emulation has a different license (copied below) which might create legal
>> problems because of that "INDEMN
On 05/21/2014 05:51 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 21/05/2014 05:54, Alexey Kardashevskiy ha scritto:
>> Hi!
>>
>> We recently discovered that not entire QEMU is GPL2-compatible, the fpu
>> emulation has a different license (copied below) which might create legal
>> problems because of that "INDEMNI
On 21.05.14 09:51, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 21/05/2014 05:54, Alexey Kardashevskiy ha scritto:
Hi!
We recently discovered that not entire QEMU is GPL2-compatible, the fpu
emulation has a different license (copied below) which might create
legal
problems because of that "INDEMNIFY" statement.
Il 21/05/2014 05:54, Alexey Kardashevskiy ha scritto:
Hi!
We recently discovered that not entire QEMU is GPL2-compatible, the fpu
emulation has a different license (copied below) which might create legal
problems because of that "INDEMNIFY" statement.
Does anyone else care (except IBM)?
What w
17 matches
Mail list logo
