Re: [Qemu-devel] finishing the transition away from SysBus init methods

2018-10-02 Thread Peter Maydell
On 2 October 2018 at 08:52, Thomas Huth wrote: > On 2018-09-27 10:11, Peter Maydell wrote: >> I had a look at how many devices are still using the SysBus init >> method (rather than the instance-init/realize pair), and it turns out >> to be only 41, which I think is reasonably tractable for doing

Re: [Qemu-devel] finishing the transition away from SysBus init methods

2018-10-02 Thread Thomas Huth
On 2018-09-27 10:11, Peter Maydell wrote: > I had a look at how many devices are still using the SysBus init > method (rather than the instance-init/realize pair), and it turns out > to be only 41, which I think is reasonably tractable for doing some > more conversions and completing this API trans

Re: [Qemu-devel] finishing the transition away from SysBus init methods

2018-10-01 Thread Peter Maydell
On 1 October 2018 at 09:52, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: > On 9/27/18 10:11 AM, Peter Maydell wrote: >> I had a look at how many devices are still using the SysBus init >> method (rather than the instance-init/realize pair), and it turns out >> to be only 41, which I think is reasonably tractable

Re: [Qemu-devel] finishing the transition away from SysBus init methods

2018-10-01 Thread Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
On 9/27/18 10:11 AM, Peter Maydell wrote: > I had a look at how many devices are still using the SysBus init > method (rather than the instance-init/realize pair), and it turns out > to be only 41, which I think is reasonably tractable for doing some > more conversions and completing this API trans