On 12/13/2011 05:55 AM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
On Mon, 12 Dec 2011, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
Really, I think this is something inherently incompatible with the
current memory API. If Xen has this unfixable special "requirement"
(it's rather a design issue IMHO), adjust the API and adapt all
On 12/13/2011 01:55 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> A bit more context to my suggestion:
>
> - we open the save state file and check the magic number and the
> version number before machine->init();
>
> - we add a new set of entries to the save state file that contains
> early_savevm functions: the
On Tue, 13 Dec 2011, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2011-12-13 12:55, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > On Mon, 12 Dec 2011, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> >>> Really, I think this is something inherently incompatible with the
> >>> current memory API. If Xen has this unfixable special "requirement"
> >>> (it's r
On 2011-12-13 12:55, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Dec 2011, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
>>> Really, I think this is something inherently incompatible with the
>>> current memory API. If Xen has this unfixable special "requirement"
>>> (it's rather a design issue IMHO), adjust the API and ad
