On 03/04/2014 08:33 AM, Don Slutz wrote:
> On 03/03/14 05:47, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>> On 03/03/2014 07:33 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>> Il 03/03/2014 02:58, Alexey Kardashevskiy ha scritto:
On 03/02/2014 08:31 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 01/03/2014 13:30, Alexey Kardashevskiy ha sc
On 03/03/14 05:47, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
On 03/03/2014 07:33 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 03/03/2014 02:58, Alexey Kardashevskiy ha scritto:
On 03/02/2014 08:31 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 01/03/2014 13:30, Alexey Kardashevskiy ha scritto:
Corrupted DMA buffer is 0x e0 -- 0x7f15c313f
Il 03/03/2014 11:47, Alexey Kardashevskiy ha scritto:
> > Sorry, I am not following you here. Does KVM map things not page-aligned?
>
> Look in exec.c for xen_enabled(). Xen's implementation of
> address_space_map/unmap is completely different.
Honestly cannot see much difference in the current
On 03/03/2014 07:33 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 03/03/2014 02:58, Alexey Kardashevskiy ha scritto:
>> On 03/02/2014 08:31 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>> Il 01/03/2014 13:30, Alexey Kardashevskiy ha scritto:
>>
>> Corrupted DMA buffer is 0x e0 -- 0x7f15c313f000.
>> The e1000 packet i
Il 03/03/2014 02:58, Alexey Kardashevskiy ha scritto:
On 03/02/2014 08:31 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 01/03/2014 13:30, Alexey Kardashevskiy ha scritto:
Corrupted DMA buffer is 0x e0 -- 0x7f15c313f000.
The e1000 packet is at 0x12ffac2 -- 0x7f15c313eac2.
(0x7f15c313f000 - 0x7f15c313eac2)
On 03/02/2014 08:31 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 01/03/2014 13:30, Alexey Kardashevskiy ha scritto:
>>> >
>>> > Corrupted DMA buffer is 0x e0 -- 0x7f15c313f000.
>>> > The e1000 packet is at 0x12ffac2 -- 0x7f15c313eac2.
>>> >
>>> > (0x7f15c313f000 - 0x7f15c313eac2) = 0x53e which is less than 0
Il 01/03/2014 13:30, Alexey Kardashevskiy ha scritto:
>
> Corrupted DMA buffer is 0x e0 -- 0x7f15c313f000.
> The e1000 packet is at 0x12ffac2 -- 0x7f15c313eac2.
>
> (0x7f15c313f000 - 0x7f15c313eac2) = 0x53e which is less than 0x5aa and
> (0x5aa - 0x53e) = 0x6c bytes get corrupted.
>
> I see
On 02/24/2014 03:20 PM, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> On 02/16/2014 03:29 PM, Hoyer, David wrote:
>
>> We are using Qemu-1.7.0 with Xen-4.3.0 and Debian jessie. We are
>> noticing that when we transfer large files from our network to the
>> guestOS via the e1000 virtual network device that we ex
Yes - we found this late last week and it did fix our issue. Thanks!
-Original Message-
From: Paolo Bonzini [mailto:paolo.bonz...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Paolo Bonzini
Sent: Monday, February 24, 2014 8:02 AM
To: Hoyer, David; Qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Moyer, Keith; Best, Tish
Subject: Re
Il 16/02/2014 05:29, Hoyer, David ha scritto:
> We are using Qemu-1.7.0 with Xen-4.3.0 and Debian jessie. We are
> noticing that when we transfer large files from our network to the
> guestOS via the e1000 virtual network device that we experience memory
> corruption on the guestOS. We have deb
On 02/16/2014 03:29 PM, Hoyer, David wrote:
> We are using Qemu-1.7.0 with Xen-4.3.0 and Debian jessie. We are
> noticing that when we transfer large files from our network to the
> guestOS via the e1000 virtual network device that we experience memory
> corruption on the guestOS. We have debu
11 matches
Mail list logo