Re: [Qemu-devel] VMSTate state of the union

2013-01-18 Thread Peter Maydell
On 18 January 2013 12:13, Juan Quintela wrote: > - virtio: Stalled for even longer. Suspect are LISTS again. My pet hate with virtio state save/restore is that the transport information isn't versioned separately from the backend info. Any chance we could split things up properly as part of a sw

Re: [Qemu-devel] VMSTate state of the union

2013-01-18 Thread Andreas Färber
Hi Juan, Am 18.01.2013 13:13, schrieb Juan Quintela: > Things missing: > - cpus: They are blocked by comment that we should be able to sent > generated fields. Stalled :-( I'm not sure what you mean here, but I have an old CPU series of yours on my radar that I am about to partially in