On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 9:19 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 10:10:44AM +0200, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>> Am 12.04.2011 09:52, schrieb Daniel P. Berrange:
>> > - If the -drive specification has readonly=on (thus O_RDONLY to
>> > open(2) call) , I expect QEMU (or the kernel)
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 10:10:44AM +0200, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 12.04.2011 09:52, schrieb Daniel P. Berrange:
> > - If the -drive specification has readonly=on (thus O_RDONLY to
> >open(2) call) , I expect QEMU (or the kernel) to forbid the
> >"eject" command on the host CDROM. This shou
Am 12.04.2011 09:52, schrieb Daniel P. Berrange:
> - If the -drive specification has readonly=on (thus O_RDONLY to
>open(2) call) , I expect QEMU (or the kernel) to forbid the
>"eject" command on the host CDROM. This should prevent two guests
>interfering seriously with each other.
>
On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 12:33:27PM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> Amit and I were discussing the pros and cons of using O_EXCL to open
> host CD-ROM devices on IRC but this discussion could benefit from more
> input.
>
> Linux block devices (like /dev/sr0 CD-ROMs) can be opened with O_EXCL
> and
On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 12:33:27PM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> Amit and I were discussing the pros and cons of using O_EXCL to open
> host CD-ROM devices on IRC but this discussion could benefit from more
> input.
>
> Linux block devices (like /dev/sr0 CD-ROMs) can be opened with O_EXCL
> and
On 04/08/2011 02:33 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
Amit and I were discussing the pros and cons of using O_EXCL to open
host CD-ROM devices on IRC but this discussion could benefit from more
input.
Linux block devices (like /dev/sr0 CD-ROMs) can be opened with O_EXCL
and only one userspace process w
