On 01/11/2012 11:48 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
> >
> > Strictly from a QEMU perspective, we can't depend on APIs that aren't
> > committed upstream yet.
We can't release any qemu that depends on something not upstream.
> The question again is: When do we consider something upstream?
This far fr
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 08:46:38PM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
> On 11.01.2012, at 20:41, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>
> > On 01/11/2012 01:38 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >>>
> I would like to see us avoiding this in the future. Headers update
> patches should mention the source and should
On 11.01.2012, at 21:16, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 01/11/2012 02:05 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>
>> On 11.01.2012, at 20:59, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>>
>>> On 01/11/2012 01:53 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 11.01.2012, at 20:52, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>> IIRC, we never had t
On 01/11/2012 02:05 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 11.01.2012, at 20:59, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 01/11/2012 01:53 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 11.01.2012, at 20:52, Anthony Liguori wrote:
IIRC, we never had this problem with qemu-kvm - as the merges were
coordinated with the kernel (subsys
On 11.01.2012, at 20:41, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 01/11/2012 01:38 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>>
I would like to see us avoiding this in the future. Headers update
patches should mention the source and should not be merged until the ABI
changes actually made it at least into kvm.gi
On 2012-01-11 20:38, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 01/11/2012 01:32 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>
>> On 11.01.2012, at 20:16, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I'm a bit unhappy about the current state of our supposed to be
>>> automatically sync'ed linux-headers directory in qemu. It has been
>>>
On 11.01.2012, at 20:59, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 01/11/2012 01:53 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>
>> On 11.01.2012, at 20:52, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>>
IIRC, we never had this problem with qemu-kvm - as the merges were
coordinated with the kernel (subsystem) tree.
>>>
>>> Are you su
On 01/11/2012 01:53 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 11.01.2012, at 20:52, Anthony Liguori wrote:
IIRC, we never had this problem with qemu-kvm - as the merges were
coordinated with the kernel (subsystem) tree.
Are you suggesting that kvm header updates go through uq/master? That seems
reasona
On 2012-01-11 20:52, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 01/11/2012 01:48 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> On 2012-01-11 20:46, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>>
>>> On 11.01.2012, at 20:41, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>>>
On 01/11/2012 01:38 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>
>>> I would like to see us avoiding this in the
On 11.01.2012, at 20:52, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 01/11/2012 01:48 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> On 2012-01-11 20:46, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>>
>>> On 11.01.2012, at 20:41, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>>>
On 01/11/2012 01:38 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>
>>> I would like to see us avoiding th
On 01/11/2012 01:48 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2012-01-11 20:46, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 11.01.2012, at 20:41, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 01/11/2012 01:38 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
I would like to see us avoiding this in the future. Headers update
patches should mention the source and should not
On 2012-01-11 20:46, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
> On 11.01.2012, at 20:41, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>
>> On 01/11/2012 01:38 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> I would like to see us avoiding this in the future. Headers update
> patches should mention the source and should not be merged until the AB
On 11.01.2012, at 20:46, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2012-01-11 20:38, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>> On 01/11/2012 01:32 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>>
>>> On 11.01.2012, at 20:16, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>>
Hi,
I'm a bit unhappy about the current state of our supposed to be
automatically
On 11.01.2012, at 20:38, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 01/11/2012 01:32 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>
>> On 11.01.2012, at 20:16, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I'm a bit unhappy about the current state of our supposed to be
>>> automatically sync'ed linux-headers directory in qemu. It has
On 01/11/2012 01:38 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
I would like to see us avoiding this in the future. Headers update
patches should mention the source and should not be merged until the ABI
changes actually made it at least into kvm.git. Same applies, of course,
to the functional changes related to tha
On 2012-01-11 20:32, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
> On 11.01.2012, at 20:16, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm a bit unhappy about the current state of our supposed to be
>> automatically sync'ed linux-headers directory in qemu. It has been
>> updated several times against undefined kernel trees, m
On 01/11/2012 01:32 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 11.01.2012, at 20:16, Jan Kiszka wrote:
Hi,
I'm a bit unhappy about the current state of our supposed to be
automatically sync'ed linux-headers directory in qemu. It has been
updated several times against undefined kernel trees, means against
n
On 11.01.2012, at 20:16, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm a bit unhappy about the current state of our supposed to be
> automatically sync'ed linux-headers directory in qemu. It has been
> updated several times against undefined kernel trees, means against
> neither a released version nor kvm.git
18 matches
Mail list logo
