On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 01:42:59AM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 02/08/2011 12:42 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 08:23:08PM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> >>On 02/07/2011 03:52 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >>>How does it? We need to know we are saving in 0.13
> >>
On (Tue) 08 Feb 2011 [01:44:32], Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 02/08/2011 01:07 AM, Amit Shah wrote:
> >On (Tue) 08 Feb 2011 [08:42:14], Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >>I see. I'm unhappy with the facts that
> >>1. if (feature) is spread all over the code instead
> >>of just in migration
> >>2. it
On 02/08/2011 12:42 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 08:23:08PM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 02/07/2011 03:52 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
How does it? We need to know we are saving in 0.13
format and skip the new subsection, otherwise
0.13 will see a subsect
On 02/08/2011 01:07 AM, Amit Shah wrote:
On (Tue) 08 Feb 2011 [08:42:14], Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
I see. I'm unhappy with the facts that
1. if (feature) is spread all over the code instead
of just in migration
2. it is also obfuscated with if (flow_control)
instead of plain if (mig
